search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
NEWS TRAVEL WEEKLY BUSINESS CONTINUED FROM THE BACK


Arrangements in the UK will be required to comply with insolvency-protection obligations under the PTRs (Atol, bonds, insurance or trusts), taking us back to where we were before July. “It will be a major concern to


the UK industry that EU states will be unlikely to recognise UK insolvency protection. Traders may need, once again, to comply with multiple insolvency and licensing regimes across the EU. “Similarly, EU-based traders


that mark-et and sell packages in the UK will be required to comply with UK insolvency- protection rules. “In the circumstances, it


makes sense for larger travel firms to consider setting up in another EU state to avail themselves of the mutual- recognition arrangements and avoid having to apply for multiple EU licences. “The thinking of regulators


is clear. The CAA ‘withdrew’ the Atols of several EU firms without a UK place of establishment at the end of September. In the event of no deal, they will have to reapply for Atols. “Similarly, UK tour


operators without a place of establishment in Ireland have been advised by the Irish Commission for Aviation Regulation that their Irish licences will not be renewed at the end of October. “Surely it is not beyond the


wit of UK and Irish regulators to allow an interim renewal of licences, especially as many licences run until the spring 2019 renewals anyway? “The CAA and Abta welcomed


PTR reform and strongly argued for consumer protection to be based not on the place of establishment but the place of sale. A no-deal Brexit could deliver their wish. But I wonder how much this will ultimately cost the UK travel industry?”


CAA probes ‘unnecessary’ spend on allocated seating


Ben Ireland ben.ireland@travelweekly.co.uk


UK air passengers could be “unnecessarily” paying up to £175 million a year for assigned seats to sit together on flights, according to CAA research.


In an interim report on airline seating charges published last weekend, the CAA suggests UK consumers are paying between £160 million and £390 million a year for assigned seats – as much as half of it without a need. The CAA began an investigation


into airline seat pricing in February. In a survey of more than 14,000 consumers, it found “having to pay in advance to sit together was one of the biggest concerns for most people”. It commissioned further


research “that found customers were confused” by variations in airline seating polices, and that the 10 biggest carriers in the UK all received complaints about the practice – with one airline receiving almost 3,000 last year. The CAA said: “Passengers with


reduced mobility may have paid to sit with a carer when the airline would have sat them together for free [and] parents highlighted concerns about being separated


Cox & Kings sells activity operator PGL for £467m


Cox & Kings has agreed a £467 million deal to sell schools and activity holidays operator PGL to Midlothian Capital Partners and a consortium of investors. PGL and holding company HB Education are part of the


86 travelweekly.co.uk 1 November 2018


SEATING: ‘People might not understand the likelihood of being split up’ £175m


Amount passengers may have spent to sit together, CAA suggests


from children, particularly those under 12.” The regulator concluded: “People might not understand the likelihood of being split up, leading them to pay the optional fee even when the chances of being split up are low.” It found consumers were likely to pay between £5 and £30 for an


Holidaybreak group and include the Studylink, NST student travel network and European Study Tours brands. Cox & Kings paid £321 million for the Holidaybreak group in 2011. Investment company Midlothian


bought UK holiday-park operator Park Leisure last year. It has offices in London and Connecticut. Cox & Kings chief executive


Peter Kerkar described the sale as part of “efforts to reduce debt


assigned seat, but costs could rise to £100.


CAA policy director Tim Johnson said: “Charging for allocated seating has become part of airlines’ pricing strategies, which can impact on those with accessibility needs and those travelling with young children. “We are also concerned about


how uneasy it is to compare prices and make an informed buying decision. We’re proposing a new framework to assess airline seating practices. “Alongside the framework, we’ll


be working with airlines to explore ways to make prices clearer and more transparent.”


and focus on high-growth asset- light businesses”. Midlothian said the businesses


formed an “industry-leading operator within the outdoor activity and educational travel sectors” with scope for growth in the UK and overseas. Neil Currie, Midlothian partner and HB Education chairman-designate, said: “We’re delighted John Firth and Peter Churchus have agreed to remain with the company.”


PICTURE: SHUTTERSTOCK


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96