search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Superior direct antimicrobial effect The use of organic acids such as formic, acetic, propionic, lactic, citric, or other organic acids has become common practice as a tool to support feed hygiene and digestion in young animals. Research has proven however that esterification of fatty acids to monoglycerides significantly increases the antibacterial activity, bio-effectivity, and molecular stability of SCFA & MCFA’s, making monoglycerides the next generation choice to reduces antibiotics and increase production performances (Table 1). The in vitro antimicrobial effectiveness of capric (C10) and lauric (C12) acid typically increases up to 30 times by esterification of a fatty acid to a monoglyceride. The glycerol moiety renders the fatty acids significantly more antibacterial active thanks to its emulsifying, detergent-like, properties and effect. The typical amphiphilic nature of monoglycerides -meaning that it has a hydrophilic or water-loving head, preferably positioned towards a water- environment, and a lipophilic or lipid-loving tail, preferably positioned towards a lipid-environment- causes disintegration of the bacterial membrane. Another advantage of the monoglyceride form is the pH-independency of the antimicrobial activity. A monoglyceride molecule stays lipid- active in a broad pH range, whereas free acids typically require a low pH to be optimally antibacterial.


Enhance the immunocompetence Improving gut health is not limited to reducing the intestinal microbial load entering the animal through feeding. Mono- (and tri) glycerides of butyric acid are thoroughly investigated over the last years and are seen as the most effective tool to improve gut health by naturally stimulating mucosal maturation. The mucosal barrier is further fortified by MCFA monoglycerides which are positively modulating the immunity i.e., boosting animals’ defence mechanisms and avoiding unnecessary -energy costly- gut inflammation.


Strategic use to promote animal health As 60% to 80% of antibiotic usage is estimated to be related to gut health issues, it is crucial for the industry to increase gut health from the very first days. Supplementing monoglycerides from the start offers a multi-targeted approach with many benefits and no disadvantages. It provides a superior direct and selective antibacterial effect, an indirect pathogens defence effect and an optimised gut health and resilience effect, thereby optimising performance and preventing diseases. The scientifically proven and cost- effective added value of esterification makes monoglycerides the right and popular choice to reduce antibiotics and optimise animal health.


Table1 – Key benefits of monoglycerides in the fight against antimicrobial resistance. Antibiotics


Monoglycerides Molecular origin Antimicrobial inhibitory spectrum Positive effect in the animal Chance to develop antimicrobial resistance


Synthetic biology Broad range


Collateral damage of beneficial bacteria Necessity to recover after antibiotic treatment Non-selective bacterial suppression


High


Esterification technology High selectivity


Positive impact on the microbiome Microbiome resilience


Microbiome balancing effect •Gut development, maturation, and protection •Mucosal immunity training Neglectable


▶ ANTIBIOTIC REDUCTION | DECEMBER 2021 91


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96