search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Improving intestinal resilience with phytogenics


The rising global human population and improving human welfare standards increase demand for animal proteins. The intestine in animals, constitutes the centre of health, which must be taken care of.


BY MANU DE LAET, GLOBAL TECHNICAL MANAGER POULTRY, DELACON S


everal trials have shown that the inclusion of phytogenic feed additives in feed enhances the performance of broilers. Alongside improved performance, the gut resilience of birds will also be


beneficially influenced. Since digestion of the feed is improved using phytogenic feed additives, fewer nutrients should be available for undesirable bacteria. This limits their population growth and the detrimental consequences typically associated with this uncontrolled growth. Next to limiting undesirable bacteria population growth, phyto- genics can influence intestinal resilience via another strategy.


Quorum sensing Quorum sensing (QS), or bacterial cell-to-cell communication, is a mechanism of gene regulation in which bacteria coordinate the expression of specific genes in response to the presence of small signalling molecules (inducers). This regulatory mechanism has been shown to control virulence gene expression in many different pathogens. Virulence factors include gene products involved in, for example, toxin production. The abundance of the signalling molecules in the environment thereby directly reflects the bacterial population density. If a certain threshold of inducer concentration is reached, the bacteria start to produce virulence factors, leading to the disease outbreak in the host. Various pathogenic bacteria like Clostridium perfringens have been shown to use QS to regulate their virulence and pathogenicity. Selected phytogenic substances can interfere with the QS of bacteria and therefore possess the ability to suppress the virulence of bacteria. This so-called quorum sensing interference (QSI) can be studied very well in a model that Delacon developed. Studies showed that a mix of phytogenic substances could decrease 35% Alpha toxin production of Clostridium perfringens. In two in vivo experiments, this


mixture showed a decrease of 37.5 % and a 54.5% decrease in necrotic enteritis lesions. Delacon performed an experimental trial (12 repetitions per treatment, 17 birds per repetition) with an industrial partner in Thailand. This trial showed that a carefully selected mixture of phytogenic substances could improve the performance of naturally challenged birds on the farm. The phytogenics, dosed to the feed at 400 g/MT (metric tons) from day 1 until day 28, improved WAFCR by 2.9 points at day 28 and 3.5 points at day 42 (Figure 1).


Natural and safe alternative The use of well-formulated phytogenic substances represents a relevant strategy in facing the challenges of modern poultry production. Apart from their proven efficacy and beneficial effects on digestibility, nutrient utilisation, and intestinal re- silience, they are natural and safe.


Figure 1 - Trial Thailand with an industrial partner: WAFCR is improved with phytogenics (400 g/MT, 1-28 days).


1.60 Control 1.50 1.40 1.313 1.30 1.20 WAFCR (1.6 kg) day 28 WAFCR (3.0 kg) day 42


WAFCR: weight-adjusted feed conversion ratio. You find the difference between the actual average flock weight and the adjusted weight to adjust the feed conversion. You then multiply the difference by 0.04 and add that number to the actual FCR.


▶ ANTIBIOTIC REDUCTION | DECEMBER 2021 63 1.284 Phytogenics 400 g/MT 1.565 1.530


PHOTO: DELACON


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96