search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Gastrointestinal functionality: Peptidoglycans and immunity


The reduction and removal of antibiotics from poultry diets requires a 360o


approach including good farm


management, nutrition, biosecurity, hygiene and a robust health and vaccination programme.


BY MOHAMMAD VADIEI, GLOBAL EUBIOTICS MANAGER, DSM F


rom a nutritional aspect, considerable solutions have been developed as gut health solution promoters such as optimisation on dietary composition and different type of feed additives including pre &


probiotics, symbiotics, phytogenics and enzymes that all support gastrointestinal functionality. Various research studies show that a strong relationship and impact between poultry feed from one side and intestine barrier, microbiota, digestion and absorption as well as with immunity on another, increase the importance of gastrointestinal functionality for achieving optimum performance in poultry. One of the most important factors in the health of the gastrointestinal functionality is bacterial debris and peptidoglycans as a main part in this structure may have a strong effect on gut and poultry performance. Commensal bacteria in the gut may not cause inflammation but fragments from any bacterial cell wall can significantly reduce the gut functionality. During bacterial turnover, a significant quantity of peptidoglycans (PGNs) is released in the lumen, and intestinal Lysozyme can degrade part of PGNs to decrease signals of potential inflammation in the intestine. Muramyl dipeptide (MDP) as result of PGNs degradation


Table 1- Intestinal measurements of experimental and control groups.


Groups Control/Duo


Balancius/Duo Control/Jejunum Balancius/Jejunum Control/Ileum Balancius/Ileum


40 Villus Villus


Height Width 1620.94 1972.58 1133.72 1257.19 933.44


1039.61


225.10 242.58 200.69 218.47 194.64 201.57


Crypt Depth 248.97 493.36 264.31 395.31 253.61 358.86


Total


Mucosa 1915.08 2288.39 1318.08 1434.17 1141.94 1221.36


Villus/ Crypt 7.21 4.30 3.91 3.89 2.69 4.29


▶ ANTIBIOTIC REDUCTION | DECEMBER 2021


Surface Area 1.17 1.50 0.75 0.81 0.57 0.69


show anti-inflammatory effects on specific intracellular receptors (NOD2) in basolateral surface of epithelial cells. Because of the genetic potential for growth, modern broilers have high feed intakes and fast feed passage rate into the gastrointestinal tract, but insufficient production of many of endogenous enzymes, not only decrease the digestibility of feed ingredients but also effect many aspects of gut functionality negatively. PGNs degradation is not exceptional from this development and endogenous lysozyme cannot breakdown all PGNs present in the intestine, so an exogenous muramidase such as Balancius can increase the capacity of PGNs degradation from dead bacterial cell walls and support gastrointestinal functionality.


PGNs and gut inflammation Goblets cells play an important role in the intestine and overall immunity via mucus secretion, containing antimicrobial proteins. Studies show supplementation of muramidase in broiler diets increases the density of goblet


Figure 1 - The addition of an exogenous muramidase (Balancius) increased the % of soluble PGNs, in jejunal digesta of broilers on day 14 and 21 (Jansman et al. – unpublished).


70 Day 14 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Control Balancius


A, BColumns with a different superscript have values that differ significantly at P<0.05.


A A Day 21 B B


Soluble peptideoglycan, % of total


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96