search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
HEALTH & SAFETY | SPONSOR


WORKPLACE EVACUATIONS|EVAC+CHAIR


One in two companies is underprepared for evacuations in the workplace and wheelchair users and the mobility- impaired are most at risk from being unable to make a safe escape, according to a survey by evacuation specialists, Evac+Chair International.


The survey of 100 human resources directors and managers, who are responsible for the safety of their employees, reported that more than one in three (35%) said that wheelchair users or mobility-impaired employees within their company did not have a Personal Emergency Evacuation Plan (PEEP), which is required in accordance with fire safety legislation.


Around half (51%) of companies possess the necessary equipment to assist disabled and mobility-impaired employees in an evacuation, and fewer than 15% of the companies with equipment use it during emergency evacuation drills, indicating a stark lack of preparation for evacuation procedures in the workplace.


Mark Wallace, Managing Director of Evac+Chair International, said: “Despite greater attention being paid to the profile of disability in the UK, it is still easy to forget that even things such as a flight of stairs can present a huge obstacle to some workers.


“This survey shows that many employers in the UK still make inadequate provision for disabled staff and this needs to be urgently addressed. Emergency evacuations are a stressful time for everyone involved. However, for mobility impaired staff it represents an even greater worry. In order to reduce stress, all staff should be fully trained and competent using evacuation equipment to help people evacuate a building safely and efficiently. If they are not, then the usefulness of the equipment is nullified.”


According to the research, 62% of staff are unfamiliar with any equipment for safe


evacuation of those who are mobility impaired, which


would indicate that there is an obvious need to ensure all companies practice with equipment during drills.


Responding to the survey findings, Jim Norman, Equality Manager at the Disability Network, said: “Everyone who enters a building must be able to leave it safely in an emergency and


assemble at a place of safety. People with disabilities may need some arrangements in place to make use of evacuation equipment


or have assistance to help them in emergencies. This research shows that many disabled workers are still facing discrimination from their employers through their inadequate provision for a safe evacuation. Employers are also failing to comply with fire safety legislation and could face prosecution.”


66 | TOMORROW’S FM YEARBOOK


Mark Wallace concluded: “Whilst they are an inconvenience, fire and evacuation drills, with the use of necessary evacuation equipment, should be carried out regularly in order to provide a safer environment for all employees.”


www.evac-chair.co.uk


INTERNATIONAL twitter.com/TomorrowsFM


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104