search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
58


Biogas Spotlight NPL Trials Identify Improved Bioaerosol Monitoring Technology


Trials conducted by the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) have identified improved methodologies for sampling and measuring bioaerosols at composting facilities. Commissioned by Defra, the first project began in 2008 and the results of a larger series of trials will be published later this summer.


As the UK seeks to reduce the quantity of waste going to landfill, there has been a growth in demand for composting, particularly to accommodate ‘green bin’ waste. In addition there has been an increase in the variety of wastes that are being composted, so it is important to be able to understand the emissions from these processes in order to minimise any impact on the environment and human health.


Micro-organisms are necessary for the composting process, so they will always be present in large quantities within the bulk material. Any handling process, such as moving, sorting or turning, is likely to create airborne dust that will contain micro-organisms, and studies have shown


that exposure to the pathogenic fungus Aspergillus fumigatus can trigger asthma, bronchitis and allergic responses, so workers and residents near composting sites are potentially at risk.


Traditional bioaerosol sampling techniques rely on the impaction of particles on a solid agar medium. However, these methods can be time- consuming and are limited by low flow rates and unreliable impaction. They are also restricted to particles that can be cultivated. In contrast, the wet walled cyclonic technology employed by the Coriolis instruments, rapidly collects biological particles in liquid at a high flow rate with validated efficiency, and the liquid containing the particles is compatible with a number of rapid microbiological analysis methods, including qPCR (quantitative polymerase chain reaction), which enables the quantification and qualification of most targets.


The objective of the initial work was to improve the accuracy and speed of traditional measurement techniques, and one of the conclusions of the project was that the wet walled cyclonic technology employed by the Coriolis, gave the best performance for quantifying biological species such as fungi and bacteria, when used in conjunction with qPCR. Some of the experimental work was carried out at the Health Protection Agency (HPA) to quantify the efficiency of sampling and analysis methods for the measurement of airborne Aspergillus fumigatus spores. This work demonstrated good correlation between Coriolis/qPCR and the HPA’s ‘standard’ method for these measurements.


As a result of the initial work, NPL now offers an Aspergillus fumigatus bioaerosol monitoring service to quantify airborne spore levels at composting sites using a rapid qPCR technique. The key advantages of this monitoring service over traditional microbiological methods are: Short sampling times; Rapid analysis; High sensitivity and broad detection range; Species specific; Detects total spore count (viable and non-viable), which overcomes any issue of emission underestimation as a result of damage to the spores during collection; Aids differentiation between background spore levels and site specific emission.


A full report in the early work has now been published on the Defra website, and further studies have been commissioned. The most recent studies have involved bioaerosol sampling with the Coriolis sampler at four different sites, every quarter during 2012. NPL’s David Butterfield says “The objective of the latest trial was to assess the sampling and monitoring technologies in greater detail, under differing weather conditions and with different sources.”


At the same time, a working group at CEN, the European Committee for Standardisation, is working on a new bioaerosol monitoring standard that is likely to accommodate the latest technology and will necessitate demonstration of equivalence.


Looking forward, Jim Mills from Air Monitors (UK), the company which launched the Coriolis in the UK, says “It will take some time before this new technology becomes standard practice, but in the meantime, with the benefit of the work that has been conducted by NPL and others, there is no reason why Coriolis should not be utilised widely to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of bioaerosol sampling at composting sites, and in many other applications such as hospitals, legionella investigations, cooling towers, animal housing and pharmaceutical manufacture.”


For More Info, email: 25747pr@reply-direct.com


One System for Stationary and Mobile Gas Analysis


All plant operators producing energy from biogas, sewer gas or landfill gas aim to optimise processes and thus ensure greater efficiency. At the same time, however, harmful components in the gas need to be kept to a minimum.


Only constant monitoring of the composition of the raw biogas in a plant can indicate changes before it is too late and thereby prevent prolonged outages. For example, if there is a warning of too


much H2S at the measurement location before the motor, the operator can act immediately to protect the motor from expensive damage.


The Multitec BioControl from Herman Sewerin (Germany) is a combined measuring instrument comprising the fixed Multitec BioControl and the mobile Multitec 540 gas measuring device and therefore offering users the greatest possible flexibility and ease of use.


Depending on the product version, the gas composition and volume can be automatically measured and monitored live at up to eight measurement locations. The Multitec 540 measures the values at the individual measurement locations sequentially and then transfers them to the Multitec BioControl via an interface.


Individual measurement locations can also be set up for mobile measurement if preferred. The Multitec 540 is removed from the docking station for mobile measurement and the measuring results are stored under the name of the measurement location. When it is replaced in the docking station following the mobile measurement, the stored protocols are automatically transferred to the Multitec BioControl and displayed.


Mobile measurements allow you to integrate even remote outdoor measuring points reliably and cost- effectively into the system.


The Multitec BioControl offers a reliable and lasting solution to measuring raw Biogas. ATEX-certified flow rate and temperature transmitters, which can be permanently installed outdoors, are available as optional accessories.


The intelligent compensation of pressure, temperature, moisture and gas composition means that the raw gas volume can be recorded and analysed reliably and accurately.


As well as displaying the instantaneous and cumulative flow rates at individual measurement locations, it also shows the associated gas energy.


The Multitec BioControl has a large colour touchscreen displaying a live view of all key measurement values. This together with the clearly laid-out menu structure makes the device very easy and intuitive to use. It is configured to the user's individual requirements, and all settings are password-protected. The device performs continuous self-tests while it is in use.


In addition, all relevant components are resistant to aggressive gases. All measurement values and settings are automatically stored on a USB stick at regular intervals to prevent loss of data. The device can also be maintained and diagnosed remotely via the internet.


email: 7ad@reply-direct.com IET Annual Buyers Guide 2013 www.envirotech-online.com


For More Info, email: 25896pr@reply-direct.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136