8 Gas Detection CO2 Gas Hazards in the Brewing Industry Are you interested in what you have
read but want to know more? 1 - Use the email address below editorials and adverts to send your enquiry to a specialist - eg
25846pr@reply-direct.com
2 - Any questions you have will be received by someone who can help with your enquiry.
Revolutionary Acoustic Gas Leak Detector
Detector Electronics Corporation (USA), global specialists in fire and gas safety systems, introduced its revolutionary FlexSonic Acoustic Gas Leak Detector recently. Detector Electronics Corporation (Det-Tronics) is part of UTC Climate, Controls & Security, a unit of United Technologies Corp.
Designed to withstand the harshest environments,
from arctic to tropical conditions, the FlexSonic detector is “a revolutionary step forward over traditional gas leak detectors,” said Jerry Slocum, managing director, Det-Tronics. “The FlexSonic detector is the first non-contact gas leak detector of its kind that recognises unique ultrasound ‘fingerprints,’” he said.
The FlexSonic detector analyses 24 discrete ultrasonic bands, ignoring nuisance ultrasonic sources. A high-fidelity microphone continuously monitors for the distinct ultrasound emitted by pressurised gas leaks across the widest spectrum of frequencies.
Unlike traditional non-contact gas leak detectors, the FlexSonic detector can be programmed to ignore background noises, discerning between gas leaks and environmental noises, such as metal-on-metal contact, fans, machinery or vehicles. For noisy applications, the FlexSonic detector learns both regularly occurring and random sounds, detecting the actual acoustic gas leak ‘signature.’
“This next-generation technology improves gas leak detection capabilities by recognising real leaks and reducing false positives,” said Michael Bragg, product group manager, Det-Tronics. “For potentially hazardous locations, the FlexSonic detector offers an additional layer of protection that compliments traditional gas leak detectors.”
For More Info, email:
26104pr@reply-direct.com
Gas Sensors for Instrument Makers
NEMOTO
Carbon Monoxide (CO)
Worldwide
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S)
Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2)
Ammonia (NH3)
Chlorine (Cl2)
Nitrogen Monoxide (NO)
The hazards associated with CO2 in the brewing industry are well known, yet people still die needlessly every year in tragic and completely avoidable accidents in breweries. Just last year in Germany, which has a good safety record, two workers died in separate incidents at the same brewery.
Chris Wilson, Crowcon’s (UK) Senior Support Engineer, discusses these incidents and explains how they could have been avoided by following the right CO2 gas safety procedures.
CO2 is extremely hazardous and can kill in two ways: either by displacing O2, leading to rapid asphyxiation, or as a toxin in its own right. Exposure to as little as 0.5% volume CO2 represents a toxic health hazard, while concentrations greater than 10%
volume can lead to death. Because CO2 is completely odourless and colourless there is no physical indication of danger until it is usually too late.
CO2 is a by-product of the fermentation process and, because the gas is heavier than air, it collects at the bottom of containers and confined spaces such as tanks and cellars and can even spill out of fermenting tanks and sink to the brewery floor, where it
forms deadly, invisible pockets. In fact, CO2 is a hazard throughout the brewing process, right through to packaging and bottling.
Fermentation tanks, beer mixing tanks, silos and other confined spaces in the brewing industry are easily accessible – it is rare for them to be fitted with safety interlocks. For this very reason rigorous safety systems should be in place and always adhered to. Employers must assess the risks these areas pose to their employees and endeavour to prevent them. In most cases, both the assessment and the safe working system will require testing of the atmosphere with gas detection equipment.
As a rule, entry should not be routine and should only be carried out if absolutely necessary. However, if entry is necessary – for example for an inspection or to ensure cleaning has been carried out correctly – suitable safety procedures must be followed.
Firstly, CO2 from the space must be completely removed. This can be done by discharging all the fermentation and pressure gasses directly into the open air using a ring main system. If this is not possible due to the layout, the CO2 must be manually extracted and safely diverted.
Prior to entering a tank or other confined space, a ‘release measurement’ of CO2 must be taken using a suitable CO2 monitor. This is the only reliable method to check whether the CO2 concentration is actually at a safe level. The measurement must be taken by a qualified person, usually by lowering the monitor into the chamber and leaving it there for several minutes. It goes without saying that any monitoring device must be durable, reliable and regularly calibrated and tested.
Anyone entering a tank or other confined space must also be equipped with a suitable gas detector. If a certain CO2 concentration is exceeded the device will go into alarm mode with both audio and visual alarms.
Generally, at a CO2 volume of 0.5 % by volume, a pre-warning is set off; at 1 to 2 % by volume the main alarm is activated. With most devices other alarm thresholds can be selected with the aim of avoiding the alarm sounding too frequently and simultaneously ensuring the safety of the person working in the container.
Both portable and fixed CO2 detectors can be used for CO2 monitoring in breweries. Fixed systems typically comprise one or more detector "heads" connected to a separate control panel. If a detector reads a dangerous CO2 level, extractor fans are automatically triggered and sirens or visual beacons can also be activated to warn workers to vacate the area. This sort of installation is suited to larger spaces like cellars and plant rooms.
However, much confined space work in the brewing industry takes place in more restricted areas like fermentation tanks where fixed detectors cannot be installed. This means compact portable units are required. Ease of use, with one button operation, should be the norm when it comes to portable detectors. This means minimal training is required while increased safety is ensured. Combining one or more sensors with powerful audible and visual signals to warn when pre-set gas levels are reached, compact portable detectors are easily carried in a confined space, ensuring that pockets of high CO2 concentration are not missed.
Certain features should be expected in every portable CO2 detector. Clearly, life-saving tools for demanding environments must be as tough as possible, with reliable electronics housed in impact-resistant casings. While the need to leave gas sensors exposed
to the atmosphere means that no instrument can be fully sealed, a high degree of protection against dust and water ingress is essential. Toughness notwithstanding, a well-designed detector will also be light and compact enough to wear for an entire shift.
Finally, because of the difficulties of working in a cramped space, perhaps under poor lighting, instruments should be easy to use. No matter how advanced a detector's internal architecture or data management options, personnel in the field should be faced with nothing more daunting than a clear display, simple, one-button operation and loud/bright alarms.
Not taking the risk of CO2 seriously has led to many unavoidable deaths. If all the safety procedures described above are observed, the risks of dealing with this colourless, odourless and tasteless gas can be significantly reduced.
For More Info, email:
26196pr@reply-direct.com Fixed Gas Monitor Launched
Oldham (France), recently announced the launch of the second generation of its successful iTrans product – the iTrans 2 fixed gas monitor for the detection of explosive gases, toxic gases or oxygen. With CSA and NEPSI approvals, the iTrans 2 is available for sale in the Americas and Asia-Pacific regions. It is anticipated that ATEX and IECEx will be received by September 2013, and GOST and InMetro approvals will follow shortly thereafter.
New for 2013
Hydrogen insensitive CO sensor in the standard 32mm diameter Size
Nemoto (Europe) B.V. email:
98ad@reply-direct.com IET Annual Buyers Guide 2013
www.envirotech-online.com
nesales@nemoto.co.jp www.nemoto.eu
The iTrans 2 employs an intelligent electronics platform to provide one or two points of detection from a single head for maximum flexibility, superior performance and lower installation costs. When in RS485 bus configuration, one system is capable of accommodating more than 200 transmitters and can monitor any combination of gases for a specific environment.
Other features and benefits of the iTrans 2 fixed gas monitor include: Non-intrusive calibration; Oldham’s industry-proven ‘smart’ sensor technology and safety features, including automatic sensor recognition, zero and cal fault protection, and access code security; HART and MODBUS communication; New IR sensing technology; Programmable relays; and Explosion-proof aluminum or stainless steel housings.
“The iTrans 2 builds upon the success of its predecessor and input from our customers to provide the next generation of superior detection performance,” said Michel Spellemaeker, Oldham’s global director of product management.
For More Info, email:
25812pr@reply-direct.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136
