search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
focus on Laboratory Products


Particle Analysis with a CCD Camera Dr Günther Crolly, Product-Manager Particle Sizers, Fritsch GmbH, Milling and Sizing, Email: crolly@fritsch.de


Dynamic Image Analysis is a perfect method if not only the particle size of powders is to be determined, but if you also want to ascertain something about their shape. For this purpose the Fritsch GmbH provides the Particle Sizer ANALYSETTE 28 ImageSizer, a functional, economically priced instrument, which is utilised for dry, well free-fl owing bulk solids.


Measuring Principle


The underlying measuring principle is quickly explained: Via a controlled feeder the sample material is directly fed into a falling chute from which it falls down into a collection container.


On the way down the particle fl ow is fl ashed by a large-area LED array and photographed in fast sequences by a CCD camera arranged on the opposite side. Therefore, the optical set-up is comparable with transmitted light microscopy, where a high contrast is obtained between the homogeneously lit, light background and the particles shadowing the light.


All images are then analysed via software and the respective selected data is displayed after the conclusion of the measurement.


Optical Set-up


As with every microscope or common camera, the size of the generated image on the retina or camera sensor depends on the magnifi cation of the utilised lens. In addition, the parameters of the camera sensor are important for the quality of attainable results. Substantial parameters are the complete size of the used sensor, the number of pixels and the maximum possible image acquisition rate.


Inside the ANALYSETTE 28, runs a 5 mega pixel camera with a 2/3 inch CCD sensor. The pixel size is at 3.45 x 3.45 µm, which in combination with a lens magnifi cation of 0.184 times, results in a lens size of 18.75 x 18.75 µm per pixel. Now if for the lower measuring range of the system images of at least 8 x 8 pixels are required, a lower measuring range of 150 µm is obtained. Through similar deliberations in this combination, the upper measuring range of 20 mm is achieved, i.e. the particle size range of 150 - 20000 µm is covered with one lens.


Altogether four different lenses are available for the ANALYSETTE 28 ImageSizer with which varying measuring ranges can be covered. The lens with the maximum magnifi cation then achieves a lower measuring range of 20 µm.


Particle Characterisation


How does the instrument recognise the particles? The number of available shades of grey of the camera is 28


= 256 (i.e. the dynamic


Measuring principle of the Particle Sizer ANALYSETTE 28 ImageSizer


range of the camera is 8 bit). Complete white corresponds with a value of 255, black is 0. In the software a threshold is set where it is decided whether a pixel belongs to the background or to a particle. As long as the appearance of the particle through the optical system generates images with a sharp contrast between black and white, the choice of this threshold is not very critical. But, if an increasingly large number of particles are outside of the focus area of the utilised lens, a clear infl uence of this parameter on the results can be observed.


Standard lens Depth of Focus


An additional parameter of the optical system comes into play now, the depth of focus. It describes the distance area within which a particle appears suffi ciently clear. Basically, the depth of focus decreases with increasing lens size. Maybe this is familiar from personal experiences in microscopy where with large magnifi cations it becomes increasingly diffi cult to create a well- focused image. This causes particles which do not exactly pass the focus area of the camera to appear as more or less blurred smudges in the images. Now the software has to decide which particles appear suffi ciently enough to be considered for the evaluation and where exactly the edge of the particle lies. This can lead to problems if lenses with varying magnifi cations are used.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144