search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Mongolian gazelle population assessment 763


FIG. 2 Distance sampling line transects (survey effort = 13,895 km), survey strata and locations of Mongolian gazelle groups encountered in the central and eastern Mongolia survey region during the May–June 2020 survey. (Readers of the print journal are referred to the online article for a colour version of this figure.)


Results


Population surveys in Mongolia The 2019 and 2020 survey data included 58 and 1,047 group observations (totalling 1,719 and 151,691 individuals), re- spectively. Mean group size was 30 (range = 1–600)in 2019 and 160 (range = 1–16,200)in 2020 (Table 1). Detection probabilities were 0.57 (95%CI = 0.39–0.85) and 0.34 (95%CI = 0.30–0.38; Fig. 3), with effective strip widths of 200 m(95%CI = 136–296 m) and 412 m(95%CI = 370– 459 m) for the 2019 and 2020 surveys, respectively; the dif- ferences are in large part because of the different right trun- cation regimes. There was an indication of size bias in estimations of mean group size for the 2020 survey data but not for the 2019 survey data because of the more severe right truncation of these earlier survey data. The gazelle group encounter rates during the 2020 survey


were highest in the south-west followed by the north Kherlen, west, Menen and central strata, and the lowest en- counter rate was in 2019 in the southern Gobi (Table 2). Overall, the encounter rate in the central and eastern steppe regions of Mongolia was substantially higher than in the


southern Gobi (0.71 vs 0.01 groups/km2). In all cases the ex- pected group size estimates were smaller than the mean group size estimates (in north Kherlen and Menen, the expected group size was less than half the mean group size), indicating that a greater proportion of larger groups tended to be seen farther from the transect line, with smaller groups more likely to be missed with increasing distance from the observers (Table 2). For the 2020 survey, estimated group density was highest


in the Menen stratum and estimated individual density was highest in the central stratum, whereas the highest abun- dance estimates were obtained for the central and north Kherlen strata. In contrast, the 2019 survey in southern Gobi yielded the lowest estimates for all of the parameters; individual density, for instance, was approximately one order of magnitude lower than the overall density for the 2020 survey (Table 3). Overall individual density estimates from the 2019 and


2020 surveys were 0.52 and 4.72 gazelles/km2, respectively, with total population estimates of 40,899 (95%CI = 16,307– 102,580) individuals in southern Gobi and 1,991,300 (95% CI = 1,464,900–2,706,700) in central and eastern Mongolia (Table 3). In 2019, most of the variance in the abundance


Oryx, 2024, 58(6), 759–768 © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605323001515


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140