search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Conservation News 693


and practitioners from 203 countries and territories met to commit to the acceleration of species recovery during the first-ever World Species Congress, hosted by Reverse the Red. At the World Conservation Congress in 2008, IUCN members adopted Resolution 4.019 calling for a World Species Congress: a science-based, interdisciplinary, inclu- sive gathering to highlight the status of species and chart the course of species conservation. National and regional conversations took place across


96 satellite events, engaging an estimated 100,000 people and facilitating rich connections, deep conversations and a broad reach. The relationship between a global event and local and regional convenings meant that national networks supporting governments in updating and im- plementing their National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans were able to connect and coalesce around the Congress. With 200 speakers representing 68 countries in 165 ses-


sions, the programme of the Congress shared messages of urgency, success and hope. Notable speakers included Jane Goodall, Russell A. Mittermeier, Jon Paul Rodríguez, Grethel Aguilar, David Cooper, Ivonne Higuero and Amy Fraenkel, as well as representatives from the governments of Angola, Ireland, India, Colombia, Peru, New Zealand, Australia, Spain, Kenya, Germany and Brazil. These speak- ers shared stories of species recovery across their spheres of influence, to galvanize further support and action to reverse species declines. Pivotal actions from the Congress are the more than


3,750 pledges made since the Reverse the Red Species Pledge launched. To achieve Global Biodiversity Frame- work targets, we need coordinated, strategic efforts from all partners. The pledge is a first step in understanding which organizations are committing their skills, experience and knowledge to the recovery of species. Pledges made during the World Species Congress include: Twycross Zoo to reverse declines of 15 threatened species by 2030; Bristol Zoological Society to reverse declines of 97 species; at the satellite event hosted by Te Nukuao Wellington Zoo, 30 conservation organizations to protect 50 species from decline; Botanic Gardens Conservation International to assess 2,000 tree species; and the IUCN Species Survival Commission’s Antelope Specialist Group to assess 95 species. The urgency to achieve global biodiversity targets is in-


creasing. But the World Species Congress was a reminder that saving species is possible. The attendees came away with insights, tools, strategies and frameworks to accelerate their efforts, and connections to more than 10,000 other conservation experts dedicated to the same goal (see Engagement Report available at reversethered.org/world- species-congress-2024). The first-ever World Species Con- gress was a pivotal moment in conservation: an attestation that, together, we can save species.


MEGAN JOYCE1 (megan.joyce@reversethered.org) and


MICHAEL CLIFFORD2 1Reverse the Red, Syracuse, New York, USA. 2Reverse the Red, Wichita, Kansas, USA


This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC BY 4.0.


Launching of the Locally led East Asian Flyway Acoustics Program


The East Asian–Australasian Flyway is a globally important bird migration route used by many species threatened by the synergistic pressures of poaching, habitat loss and climate change (Yong et al., 2021, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 613172). There aremajor knowledge gaps regarding the ecol- ogy of birds in the Flyway, and the key threats and causes of population declines. Recent advances in acoustic recording technology and machine learning for automated detection of bird sounds have improved the monitoring of migratory birds. However, the bias towards species in temperate regions, particularly North America, means these tools are not as effective or accessible in Southeast Asia. A lack of locally relevant resources and trainingmaterials creates an additional barrier for conservationists in the region. To improve conservation of migratory birds in the East


Asian–Australasian Flyway, the Locally led East Asian Flyway Acoustics programme began acoustic data collec- tion in September 2024, during the autumn migration, across 17 locations in Cambodia, Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines and Taiwan. Embracing a locally led ap- proach, participants from across the region have worked since January 2024 to prepare for the deployment of au- tonomous recording units, learn analytical approaches for acoustic data and develop research questions. Participants also formed working groups focused on bird identifica- tion, machine learning, scientific publication and commu- nity outreach. The acoustic data collected will be used to map migration across the Flyway, filling data gaps in the citizen science platform eBird (ebird.org). Participants will also work with developers of the research platform BirdNET (birdnet.cornell.edu), which aims to automate acoustic bird species recognition at a large scale, and SILIC (Sound Identification and Labeling Intelligence for Creatures) that can recognize 257 species of terrestrial vertebrates found in Taiwan, including 213 bird species (Wu et al., 2022, Ecological Informatics, 101524; silic. tbn.org.tw). Their input will help to evaluate and improve the performance of automated algorithms for the identi- fication of migratory bird species in the Flyway. Acoustic monitoring produces extensive datasets that


can be analysed to identify species, track migration routes and patterns, and detect threats and changes in bird popula- tions and habitats. These datasets offer fine-scale spatial and


Oryx, 2024, 58(6), 689–699 © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605324001121


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140