814 B. Sharma et al.
INSKIP,C.&ZIMMERMANN,A.(2009) Human–felid conflict: a review of patterns and priorities worldwide. Oryx, 43, 18–34.
JAFAR, A.J.N. (2018) What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal: EMJ, 35, 323–324.
JORDAN, N.R., SMITH, B.P., APPLEBY, R.G., VAN EEDEN, L.M. & WEBSTER, H.S. (2020) Addressing inequality and intolerance in human–wildlife coexistence. Conservation Biology, 34, 803–810.
KANAGARAJ, R.,WIEGAND, T., KRAMER-SCHADT, S., ANWAR,M.& GOYAL, S.P. (2011) Assessing habitat suitability for tiger in the fragmented Terai Arc Landscape of India and Nepal. Ecography, 34, 970–981.
LAMICHHANE, B.R., PERSOON, G.A., LEIRS, H., POUDEL, S., SUBEDI, N., POKHERAL, C.P. et al. (2019) Contribution of buffer zone programs to reduce human–wildlife impacts: the case of the Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Human Ecology, 47, 95–110.
MARCHINI,S. & MACDONALD, D.W. (2012) Predicting ranchers’ intention to kill jaguars: case studies in Amazonia and Pantanal. Biological Conservation, 147, 213–221.
MCINTURFF, A., CANNON, C.E.B., ALAGONA, P.S. & PELLOW, D.N. (2021) Meeting at the crossroads. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 9, 00172.
MEKONEN,S.(2020) Coexistence between human and wildlife: the nature, causes and mitigations of human wildlife conflict around Bale Mountains National Park, southeast Ethiopia. BMC Ecology, 20, 51.
NYHUS, P.J. (2016) Human–wildlife conflict and coexistence. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41, 143–171.
OJHA,A. (2022) Bardiya National Park wins TX2 Award for tiger conservation. The Kathmandu Post, 28 January 2022.
kathmandupost.com/national/2022/01/28/bardiya-national-park- wins-tx2-award-for-tiger-conservation [accessed 23 June 2022].
RCORE TEAM (2023) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
R-project.org [accessed March 2024].
RAUNIYAR,T. (2021) Why have tiger attacks spiked in Nepal’s Bardia National Park? The Third Pole, 11 May 2021.
thethirdpole.net/en/ nature/why-have-tiger-attacks-spiked-in-nepals-bardia-national- park [accessed 20 July 2021].
RIPLEY,R.&VENABLES,W.(2023) nnet: Feed-Forward Neural Networks and Multinomial Log-Linear Models. R package version 7.3-19.
CRAN.R-project.org/package=nnet [accessed September 2024].
RIPPLE,W.J.&BESCHTA, R.L. (2012) Trophic cascades in Yellowstone: the first 15 years after wolf reintroduction. Biological Conservation, 145, 205–213.
SABERWAL, V.K., GIBBS, J.P., CHELLAM,R.&JOHNSINGH, A.J.T. (1994) Lion–human conflict in the Gir Forest, India. Conservation Biology, 8, 501–507.
SCHWERDTNER,K. & GRUBER,B.(2007) A conceptual framework for damage compensation schemes. Biological Conservation, 134, 354–360.
SHARMA,B.&NEUPANE,D.(2023) Enhancing human–tiger coexistence in forest corridors of Nepal through a socio-ecological approach to conservation. Trees, Forests and People, 13, 100402.
SILLERO-ZUBIRI, C., SUKUMAR,R.&TREVES,A. (2006) Living with wildlife: the roots of conflict and the solutions. In Key Topics in Conservation Biology (eds D. Macdonald & K. Service), pp. 255–265. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, USA.
SMITH, J.L.D., AHEARN, S.C. & MCDOUGAL,C.(1998) Landscape analysis of tiger distribution and habitat quality in Nepal. Conservation Biology, 12, 1338–1346.
STRÆDE,S.&HELLES,F.(2000) Park–people conflict resolution in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal: buying time at high cost? Environmental Conservation, 27, 368–381.
STRONZA, A.L., HUNT, C.A. & FITZGERALD, L.A. (2019) Ecotourism for conservation? Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 44, 229–253.
STRUEBIG, M.J., LINKIE, M., DEERE, N.J., MARTYR, D.J., MILLYANAWATI, B., FAULKNER, S.C. et al. (2018) Addressing human–tiger conflict using socio-ecological information on tolerance and risk. Nature Communications, 9, 3455.
THAPA, K.,WIKRAMANAYAKE, E., MALLA, S., ACHARYA, K.P., LAMICHHANE, B.R., SUBEDI, N. et al. (2017) Tigers in the Terai: strong evidence for meta-population dynamics contributing to tiger recovery and conservation in the Terai Arc Landscape. PLOS One, 12,e0177548.
TREVES,A. & KARANTH, K.U. (2003) Human–carnivore conflict and perspectives on carnivore management worldwide. Conservation Biology, 17, 1491–1499.
VAN HORNE, Y.O., ALCALA, C.S., PELTIER, R.E., QUINTANA, P.J.E., SETO, E., GONZALES, M. et al. (2023) An applied environmental justice framework for exposure science. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 33, 1–11.
WEBER,W.&RABINOWITZ,A. (1996) A global perspective on large carnivore conservation. Conservation Biology, 10, 1046–1054.
WEGGE, P., YADAV, S.K. & LAMICHHANE, B.R. (2018) Are corridors good for tigers Panthera tigris but bad for people? An assessment of the Khata Corridor in lowland Nepal. Oryx, 52, 35–45.
WHITE, P.C.L.,WARD, A.I.,WHITE, P.C.L. &WARD, A.I. (2010) Interdisciplinary approaches for the management of existing and emerging human–wildlife conflicts.Wildlife Research, 37, 623–629.
WIKRAMANAYAKE, E., MCKNIGHT, M., DINERSTEIN, E., JOSHI, A., GURUNG,B.&SMITH,D.(2004) Designing a conservation landscape for tigers in human-dominated environments. Conservation Biology, 18, 839–844.
WILSON, C.J. (2004) Could we live with reintroduced large carnivores in the UK? Mammal Review, 34, 211–232.
WOLI,L. (2022) Impact of homestays on socio-economic opportunities of the local community. KMC Journal, 4, 212–223.
Oryx, 2024, 58(6), 806–814 © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605323001849
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140
