search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
African elephant crop foraging 785


elephant crop foraging is not reaching local farmers and that multiple barriers exist regarding the uptake of deterrents. Our findings suggest several key management recommen- dations. Firstly, increased outreach efforts to farmers are needed to share knowledge on deterrent approaches, espe- cially in remote areas. Secondly, community leaders are needed who can help encourage farming communities to in- corporate existing deterrents or who can create and share sustainable solutions that are effective and practical within the local context. Thirdly, farmers need information on how to live safely near elephants, to decrease both the fear and the risk associated with elephant encounters.Acombination of these efforts could increase local food security, tolerance of elephants and support for conservation programmes. Without additional educational and financial resources, elephant crop foraging is likely to persist. However, our study provides insights that could help practitioners address some previously little examined economic and social con- cerns of farmers related to the use of elephant deterrents.


Author contributions Study design: LVH, BAS, KD, MG, SZ, CAL; fieldwork: LVH; data analysis: LVH, TDS, KD, CAL; writing: LVH, BAS, MG, CAL.


Acknowledgements Wethank the collaborators at WildlifeWorks, including the community outreach team, staff scientists, rangers and office personnel, and Hellen Kiute, who facilitated local stakeholder in- teractions. LVH was supported by grants from the International Elephant Foundation, the Elephant Manager’s Association and Auburn University, and the project was facilitated in conjunction with the Earthwatch Institute’s Elephants and Sustainable Agriculture in Kenya project. We appreciate the trust bestowed upon us by the Kenyan people, including village representatives and partici- pants from the communities that welcomed us.


Conflicts of interest None.


Ethical standards This research abided by the Oryx guidelines on ethical standards. Survey and consent procedures were approved by Auburn University’s Institutional Review Board panel (Protocol no. 20-440 EX 2009) and Strathmore University’s Institutional Ethics Review Committee (Approval no. SU-IERC0877/20) in Kenya. The re- search was conducted under the umbrella of Wildlife Works’ PIC/ MAT agreement with Kenya Wildlife Service and with approval from NACOSTI (Kenya’s science agency, License no. NACOSTI/P/ 20/2292).


Data availability Data are available in the Supplementary Material and on request from the corresponding author.


References


ADAMS, T., MWEZI,I.&JORDAN, N.R. (2020) Panic at the disco: solar-powered strobe light barriers reduce field incursion by African elephants Loxodonta africana in Chobe District, Botswana. Oryx, 55, 739–746.


ARNOLD,T.W. (2010) Uninformative parameters and model selection using Akaike’s Information Criteria. Journal ofWildlife Management, 74, 1175–1178.


BARUA, M., BHAGWAT,S.&JADHAV,S.(2013) The hidden dimensions of human–wildlife conflict: health impacts, opportunity and transaction costs. Biological Conservation, 157, 309–316.


BUCHHOLTZ, E.K., FITZGERALD, L.A., SONGHURST, A.,MCCULLOCH, G.P.&STRONZA, A.L. (2020) Experts and elephants: local ecological knowledge predicts landscape use for a species involved in human-wildlife conflict. Ecology and Society, 25, 26.


BURNHAM, K.P. & ANDERSON, D.R. (2002) Model Selection and Multimodal Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, Second edition. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.


CHANG’A, A., DE SOUZA, N., MUYA, J., KEYYU, J., MWAKATOBE, A., MALUGU, L. et al. (2016) Scaling-up the use of chili fences for reducing human-elephant conflict across landscapes in Tanzania. Tropical Conservation Science, 9, 921–930.


CHUNG,J.&MONROE,G.(2003) Exploring social desirability bias. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 291–302.


DAVIES, T.E.,WILSON, S.,HAZARIKA, N., CHAKRABARTY, J., DAS, D., HODGSON, D.J. & ZIMMERMANN,A. (2011) Effectiveness of intervention methods against crop-raiding elephants. Conservation Letters, 4, 346–354.


DICKMAN, A.J. (2010) Complexities of conflict: The importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human–wildlife conflict. Animal Conservation, 13, 458–466.


DISTEFANO,E.(2005) Human-wildlife ConflictWorldwide: Collection of Case Studies, Analysis of Management Strategies and Good Practices. Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome, Italy.


DOHMEN, T., FALK, A., HUFFMAN, D., SUNDE, U., SCHUPP,J.& WAGNER,G.(2011) Individual risk attitudes: measurement, determinants and behavioral consequences. Journal of European Economic Association, 9, 522–550.


FERNANDO,P.(2015) Managing elephants in Sri Lanka: where we are and where we need to be. Ceylon Journal of Science, 44, 1–11.


FOLKE, C., HAHN, T., OLSSON,P.&NORBERG,J. (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473.


GALVIN, K.A., BEETON, T.A. & LUIZZA, M.W. (2018) African community-based conservation: A systematic review of social and ecological outcomes. Ecology and Society, 23, 39.


GILSDORF, J.M.,HYGNSTROM, S.E.&VERCAUTEREN, K.C. (2002) Use of frightening devices in wildlife damage management. Integrated Pest Management Reviews, 7, 29–45.


GITHIRU, M., MUTWIWA, U., KASAINE,S.&SCHULTE,B. (2017)A spanner in the works: human–elephant conflict complicates the food–water–energy nexus in drylands of Africa. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 5, 69.


GRAHAM, M.D. & OCHIENG,T. (2008) Uptake and performance of farm-based measures for reducing crop raiding by elephants Loxodonta africana among smallholder farms in Laikipia District, Kenya. Oryx, 42, 76–82.


GROSS, E.M. (2019) Tackling Routes to Coexistence: Human-Elephant Conflict in Sub-Saharan Africa. GIZ Partnership against Poaching and IllegalWildlife Trade, Bonn, Germany.


GROSS, E.M., LAHKAR, B.P., SUBEDI, N., NYIRENDA, V.R., LICHTENFELD, L.L. & JAKOBY,O. (2018)Seasonality, crop type and crop phenology influence crop damage by wildlife herbivores in Africa and Asia. Biodiversity and Conservation, 27, 2029–2050.


HEDGES,S.&GUNARYADI,D.(2010) Reducing human–elephant conflict: do chillies help deter elephants from entering crop fields? Oryx, 44, 139–146.


HILL, C.M. (2000)Conflict of interest between people and baboons: crop raiding in Uganda. International Journal of Primatology, 21, 299–315.


HILL, C.M. (2018)Crop foraging, crop losses, and crop raiding. Annual Review of Anthropology, 47, 377–394.


Oryx, 2024, 58(6), 779–787 © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605323001795


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140