search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FINANCE


Brent Goodwin


Reverse charges for contractors


As of 1 October, the domestic reverse charge means that in many cases VAT on standard- rated and reduced-rated construction services must be paid to HMRC by the customer receiving the service or supply, rather than by the supplier as is currently the case. In essence, this will shift


responsibility for accounting for the VAT on “specified services” from the supplier on to the recipient – for example, from a sub-contractor to a main contractor. The reverse charge will only


apply to specified services reported under the Construction Industry Scheme (CIS) and that take place between VAT-registered businesses. The reverse charge will not apply if the service or supply is made to an end-user, or businesses connected to the end-user that falls within the definition of an intermediary supplier. Anyone currently on the


VAT flat rate scheme should not include reverse charge supplies in their turnover, but should deal with these outside the scheme. Brent Goodwin, VAT Manager at Newby Castleman, said: “I would urge sub- contractors or contractors on the flat rate scheme to reassess the benefits of remaining in the scheme, especially if a large number of their supplies are subject to the reverse charge; and, for those receiving or making reverse charge supplies, it’s worth checking software will be compliant with the new invoicing rules. “We would advise sub-


contractors and other workers affected to seek professional advice on the reverse charge and its implications.” The Federation of Master


Builders is calling for a six-month delay to the implementation of the reverse charge, so those affected have more time to prepare for the change.


90 business network October 2019


Improvements will be made to local roads in the region


Essential East Midlands road scheme is planned


Plans for three transformational road schemes in the East Midlands have been submitted to Government by sub-national transport body midlands Connect, with a funding request for £229m to deliver them. Midlands Connect was empowered by the Department for Transport (DfT) to work with the 22 councils in its partnership to identify priority schemes to improve local roads in the region, as part of a £3.5bn national fund available from 2020-2025. The fund covers upgrades to the Major Road


Network (MRN), a new category of the busiest and most economically important local authority A roads. The MRN was established by Government to focus on funding schemes that will reduce congestion, support housing and employment growth, encourage people to walk, cycle and use public transport, and provide better links to motorways and major trunk roads. The £3.5bn Government fund also includes Large


Local Majors (LLM) schemes, which focus on bigger upgrades to local roads. MRN schemes must include a Government funding


request of £20-50m each, and LLM schemes more than £50m, with a local contribution of at least 15%. Following detailed consultation and a rigorous


assessment, Midlands Connect has submitted seven priority MRN schemes and four LLM schemes to the DfT for consideration. The East Midlands schemes submitted by Midlands


Connect come with a request to the Government for £229m to deliver them, with another £66m funded locally. The total Midlands-wide funding request to the Government is £596m, with an additional £143m funded locally from a mixture of public and private sector sources. If successful, local authorities would deliver the physical infrastructure required. Simon Statham, Midlands Connect’s Head of


Technical Programmes, said: “A reliable transport network is essential to the success of the Midlands. The Major Road Network targets funding specifically at schemes that help improve job opportunities, open up new housing developments, and importantly address our environmental obligations as well. Objectives for the funding include understanding how a scheme will


The MRN and LLM schemes in the East Midlands submitted to the Government include:


• A511 Coalville Growth Corridor, Leicestershire (MRN): nine junction improvements, local widening and a new link road connecting the A511 to Bardon Link Road.


• Chesterfield-Staveley Regeneration Route, Derbyshire (LLM): a new 5.7km single carriageway, connecting the A619 north of Chesterfield town centre to the A6192 and A619 at Staveley. The route is critical to the North Derbyshire Growth Zone, with 5,700 new jobs planned, and provides access to the HS2 Infrastructure Maintenance Depot at Staveley.


• Another East Midlands MRN scheme, improvements on the A614 from Ollerton to Lowdham in Nottinghamshire, has already received a funding commitment of £18m from Government, announced in October 2018. Midlands Connect submitted the scheme following a request to put forward those that could be delivered early in the 2020-2025 period, and therefore needed an earlier funding decision.


create improvements for all road users, not just cars, and improve air quality by reducing congestion. “By speaking with a collective voice on behalf of the Midlands, we believe each of the schemes submitted has provided all the evidence Government needs to fund them in full, and we expect to be celebrating a £600m investment in to the region to help our local authorities get on and deliver this transformational programme of upgrades.” Midlands Connect is encouraging Government to


allocate funding for shortlisted schemes as soon as possible to ensure their smooth delivery.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100