This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
INSTRUCTION 101


VARIABLE-PRACTICE INSTRUCTION: THE MERITS OF MIXING IT UP


%\ &KHU\O $ &RNHU DQG 0DUMRULH $ .LQJ I


t’s the peak of Christmas week and you’ve been assigned a client who wants to progress from long-radius, open-parallel turns to medium- and possibly even short-radius turns. What if you could consult two seasoned coaches and use two different


approaches to help the student develop a centered stance and turning skills? Would the student benefit more from certain tasks practiced repeatedly on the same terrain… or from mixing things up?


COACH A IS KEEN ON REPETITION OF TASKS


Let’s say Coach A suggests choosing a moderate blue trail, with plenty of width, good snow conditions, and low traffic. He covers a few key components of stance and turning the skis, and recommends that the student stick to that one trail and work on familiar terrain to hone a balanced stance and incrementally reduce the radius of those long-radius turns. For the duration of the lesson, the client


performs balance and turn drills repeatedly, skiing on the same trail. Upon growing more comfortable with the terrain and techniques involved, she starts to adjust her turn shape. As the lesson concludes, the student can now successfully negotiate the terrain of that trail and is very pleased to have “mastered” turning with a shorter radius.


COACH B VOTES FOR VARIABLE PRACTICE


Now let's examine the advice of Coach B – who also suggests choosing a moderate blue trail, with plenty of width, groomed snow


84 | 32 DEGREES • WINTER 2017


conditions, and low traffic. And, yes, the coach emphasizes that you should cover key components of stance and turning the skis. Tat, however, is where the similarities end. Coach B suggests that, after the first run, you maintain the same instructional focus but


work on a series of varied terrain options: QFirst, by negotiating terrain of similar steepness but less-than-ideal grooming


Q Ten, taking a run with better grooming but a steeper pitch


Coach B says the student may struggle a bit with either or both of these changes, but not to worry. He even suggests next selecting a trail well-groomed and no steeper than the first run, but that’s much narrower (again, warning that the student will struggle a bit). Finally, Coach B encourages you to return to the first trail to allow the student to “ski it out” and finish with some mileage. You put Coach B’s advice to work, and at the end of the lesson the student is beaming, happy to have “mastered” turning with a shorter radius.


WHAT’S THE BETTER PLAN OF ATTACK?


Which of these coaches gave the best advice for a successful lesson? You may be tempted to answer with the rationale that numerous repetitions of a task, as suggested by Coach


Repetition of tasks on smooth terrain (left); variable practice on variable terrain (right)


A, will engrain the movement and lead to superior skiing.


While this strategy works well with beginners trying to get the hang of how to perform the movement initially, research has shown that the repetitive-task approach does not result in optimal learning for intermediate and advanced clients. Instead, research indicates that varying the task and the context in which the task is performed will lead to more successful long-term outcomes. If you’ve used the repetition-until-


mastery approach, you’re probably a little perplexed by this claim. After all, you’ve probably noticed that your clients do appear to be more competent at that task by the end of the lesson. Studies


have shown, however, that


although the rote repetition of a task does improve performance during practice, those performance changes are only temporary. In other words, it’s unlikely that students will be able to perform at the same level later in the day when they decide to go off to another part of the mountain with friends or family or the following weekend. When clients are asked to practice the same task repeatedly, they tend to settle into a groove and go into autopilot. Contrary to popular belief, this does not improve muscle memory. Te truth is, muscles don’t remember anything. Te brain does, however, and it needs to be stimulated to promote long-term performance improvements. When clients settle into a groove, they no longer actively process information at the level needed for this stimulation to occur.


PHOTOS BY SHERRI HARKIN


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124