Schedule K -
Plan 2.6 - DCO July 2013 Ref No.
Fig 24.3.2 Hedge
number
Application - Important
Hedgerows - Plan 2.6 Ref No.
Hedgerow crossed? (y/n) Proposed work to be carried out
Archaeologically Important (Part II 1-5)and Botanically Important Hedgerows (Part II 7 (3) ( Listed as Schedule J DCO)
Hedgerows supporting Protected Species (Part II 6 (3)
Identified in
Hedgerows adjacent to public right of way (Part II 8)
ES as visually important
Landscape Designation
focal point hedgerows
Significant Residual Effects
Hedges with 5 Barbastelle or 200 bat passes
Hedges with 1 Barbastelle bats
Detailed Engineering methods to eliminate significant residual effects
The tree copse in the corner of
the nursery plot creates a focal point along the lane and gives a visually
mature setting
to the approach into
Woodbridge. The
58 57b 24 yes Mini HDD (Sandy Lane) Archaeological important hedge: Parish boundary (Part II, 1) Yes SLA Yes
boundaries are also botanically important.
The tree copse in the corner of
the nursery plot creates a focal point along the lane and gives a visually
mature setting
to the approach into
Woodbridge. The
59 56 24 yes Mini HDD (Sandy Lane) Archaeological important hedge: Parish boundary (Part II, 1) Yes SLA Yes
boundaries are also botanically important.
The tree copse in the corner of
the nursery plot creates a focal point along the lane and gives a visually
mature setting
to the approach into
Woodbridge. The
60 61 62 63 64 65
58
58a 58b 60 61
61a 24
yes yes yes yes yes yes
Mini HDD (Sandy Lane)
Approximate 35m hedgerow breach Approximate 35m hedgerow breach Approximate 35m hedgerow breach Approximate 35m hedgerow breach Approximate 35m hedgerow breach
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lines of mature conifers
forming visual enclosure at a
busy junction of the A12. Cable route is currently
planned to go
66 67
61b 61c
None
yes yes
Special engineering to give narrow breach. Some tree loss likey
Approximate 35m hedgerow breach
through centre of the
Yes Yes
SLA Yes Yes hedgeline.
Micro routing reconfiguration of standard trench profiles and alteration to working methods to reduce working width. Tree removal confined to southern end of tree belt.
Yes SLA Yes
boundaries are also botanically important.
HDD proposed under the whole copse HDD proposed under the whole copse HDD proposed under the whole copse
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129