This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
12.2 170 12.3


Pre-construction Survey


A preconstruction survey would be undertaken in line with the baseline methodology and between April and October.


Additional mitigation Pre-construction


171


At the landfall, a thorough hand search by a suitably qualified ecologist followed by strimming would dissuade reptiles from the area and would be sufficient, as suitable unaffected habitat would remain.


172


To minimise any potential impact to reptiles the working areas where reptiles have been recorded in low numbers would be made unsuitable prior to any works commencing by reducing cover as much as possible (by mowing or strimming to 5cm above ground-level) to discourage reptiles from the area. These sections would then be left for one week to allow reptiles to move out of the area.


173


The 15 hedges would be coppiced using hand tools to prevent injuring any reptiles resting at the bases. Vegetation bases would only be removed once the area has been deemed clear of reptiles. These processes would be undertaken under a watching brief by a suitably qualified ecologist and any reptiles found would be transported to suitable habitat at least 50 m away from construction works. These receptor sites would be identified during the pre- construction walkover survey and clearly marked on maps to enable landowner permission to be gained prior to works commencing.


174


A reptile capture and release programme would be implemented at one location: Reptile location 045 - Large area of grass and scrub. Only a proportion of the site will be temporarily lost. Capture and release will be to remaining unaffected areas of Reptile location 045 subject to landowner agreement. As reptiles will be moved to unaffected remaining habitat, habitat management measures of the retained habitat will be undertaken in the year prior to construction. This will aim to improve the carrying capacity of retained habitat during the construction period.


175


At the remaining eight locations the areas concerned are small in size (e.g. narrow liner features at hedgerows) or have difficult access (Bawdsey Cliff) and the impacts would be short term and temporary, therefore it has been deemed inappropriate to implement a capture and release program here. At


Outline Landscape and Ecological Management Strategy. Version 2 Page 47


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129