MYSTERY BUYER
Meeting the challenge…
Whether they like it or not,
travel managers have the right skills to tackle meetings spend
J
UST BEFORE CHRISTMAS LAST YEAR, the Institute of Travel & Meetings filed a “Notice of Change of Name by Resolution” with Companies House,
reverting to its old name – the Institute of Travel Management. To the outside world, there are two ways to see this. First, the institute has decided that meetings management is so far removed from travel management that it’s not part of the ITM membership’s usual remit. After all, most of the big travel management companies have separate divisions within their organisations to handle meetings and events. The second interpretation is that meetings management is such an integral part of the travel management function that there is no need to make the distinction – after all, we don’t have an Institute of Air Travel Management or an Institute of Hotel Travel Management, even though the two sub-disciplines require many different skill-sets. To a degree, both points of view
are correct. In many ways, managing meetings is different from managing transient travel, but some travel managers cover the meetings side of the business, in addition to their day job. That creates problems. In one sense, the ITM was ahead of the game when it added “meetings” to its title. While most corporates understand travel management, so far, only a few recognise the benefits of meetings management. All too often, meetings are just something that happen; sales meetings are held on a monthly basis, regardless of if there’s anything to discuss; training
48 BBT May/June 2017
sessions are scheduled with little or no reference to specific training needs. Facts and figures are thin on the
ground, but it is generally accepted that around 40 per cent of corporate meetings are internal. There is a cost attached, not least because meetings take participants away from their desks. Travel managers are good at asking whether a business trip is necessary and working out the most cost-effective arrangements. In most cases, compliance has increased recently as travellers and employers recognise that travel management has a value, both financially and in terms of traveller wellbeing.
TOUGH NUTS
Meetings management is often a tougher nut to crack. If employers don’t know the return on investment (ROI) generated by a sales meeting, for example, they can’t know whether there are better or more cost-effective ways of achieving the objectives. In many cases, meetings are held simply because that’s the way it has always been done, and there is a resistance to change – just as there once was in the travel management sector. It’s not long ago that travel policies
were seen as rules waiting to be circumvented, if not broken. Travel managers the world over had the uphill task of persuading travellers that economy class wasn’t that bad and there are plenty of good three-star hotels. Today, the emphasis has shifted from
BUYINGBUSINESSTRAVEL.COM
‘cost’ to ‘value’, because travel buyers (and TMCs) have become more adept at working out the ROI of a trip.
The travel management function today bears little resemblance to a decade ago. Technology has helped, but mostly the changes have been wrought by travel managers themselves.
Similar skills can and should apply to meetings management. Unfortunately, the sector has long been lumped under the MICE banner, and managing a meeting is a completely different proposition to managing an incentive, conference or major event. Forward-thinking corporates are
recognising that all meetings need to be managed. They see that there is a cost attached (although they are often not sure what that cost is) and, therefore, there are potential savings to be made. They need someone with the ability to establish, as far as possible, what that cost is and where savings can be made, and then communicate the changes to the end-users and educate them about the benefits of adoption to overcome resistance to change. Does that process ring any bells?
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136