This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Carbon and energy reduction


Experience shows a strong case for CHP


With considerable pressure on NHS Trusts to make energy and cost savings, and simultaneously to reduce their emissions and carbon footprint, energy services company and Energy Performance Contract (EPC) specialist, Cynergin, takes a look at how Trusts across the country are ‘overhauling their energy infrastructures and moving towards greener technologies – with CHP systems at the heart of many projects’.


worth of savings for acute hospital Trusts in England annually; these Trusts currently spend around £55.6 billion per annum. With hospital estates spending some £750 million on energy each year, one of the key recommendations was for all Trusts to have a strategic estates and facilities plan that would reduce their energy costs and contribute to the savings target required to be achieved by 2020/2021. Combined Heat and Power (CHP) systems were among the technologies highlighted. Cynergin, one of the leading energy savings companies (ESCOs), is working in partnership with Trusts across the country to invest in the latest technologies that not only boost their environmental credentials, but will also drive down their energy costs and deliver tangible savings. With their 24/7, 365 day-a-year functionality, hospitals are, by their nature, high energy consumers. Heavily reliant on electricity, hot water, steam, cooling, and air-conditioning, they are ideal candidates for CHP systems, which can produce the energy required for these functions. Indeed the number of hospital Trusts investing in CHP systems is climbing steadily, and, for many, combined heat and power forms


L


Figure 1: CHP systems’ benefits for NHS Trust users.


 Lower energy bills.  Combats escalating price rises and volatility in the energy markets.


 Reduces fossil fuel consumption.  Reduces emissions.  Lowers carbon footprint.  Affords greater security of supply and the required quantity of hot water.  Availability of grant funding.


ord Carter’s ground-breaking report, published in February, highlighted how the NHS could generate £5 billion


Cynergin says many Trusts are ‘overhauling their energy infrastructures and moving towards greener technologies – with CHP systems at the heart of many projects’.


a major part of their overall strategy for reducing energy and their dependence on the National Grid. Lower and more predictable energy bills are clearly attractive for any estates manager looking both to balance the books and meet environmental obligations.


A simple process


The principal benefit of a CHP system is to save money and have a reliable continuous source of heating, hot water, and electrical power for lighting and other services. The process is relatively simple; a CHP system burns fuel – typically natural gas – to generate electricity, and useful heat is generated for heating and hot


water. CHP systems waste less fuel than a combination of grid electricity and local boilers, and produce less CO2


. As the


health sector is a heavy energy user, the potential benefits for the NHS are significant (see Figure 1). Cynergin has collaborated on a number of CHP projects, understands the technology, and has various projects at different stages that can provide a valuable insight and showcase exactly what can be achieved. As Dr Howard Stone, a director at Cynergin explains, there are five key stages that hospitals need to consider and go through before they can sit back and reap the rewards of their investment. These are:


Health Estate Journal 55September 2016


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120