HEALTHCARE HYGIENE
every single patient in order to identify opportunities, and it is unrealistic to think that observers can track every activated hand hygiene event that has taken place through keeping a watchful eye alone.
Finally, the resource needs make direct observation far from perfect. Through more efficient monitoring approaches, already strained NHS bodies can make better use of healthcare workers’ time – assigning them to other pressing tasks that are more of a reflection of their medical expertise and utilising the true value that they bring to any given establishment.
There are several monitoring options available to hospitals, but making the right decision on which to choose has a significant impact on its success – both in terms of hand hygiene compliance rates, as well as any financial implications in its installation and operating costs.
With the technological solutions now available on the market, however, there are still drawbacks that must be accounted for. Let’s take video monitoring as an example. Having 24/7 surveillance might initially seem like an appropriate choice of ‘modern’ monitoring, but it is subject to exactly the same pitfalls as traditional direct observation. Having people trawl through hours-worth of video footage from locations across a whole hospital site is costly, while being practically impossible to keep track of effectively.
Similarly with real-time locating system (RTLS) technology, the impracticalities are apparent, first and foremost because simply tracking a member of staff’s location gives no actual insight into whether they are washing their hands regularly. Also, by tracking compliance on such an individual basis, the accountability for non-compliance becomes that much more personal. Of course, many would say that medical professionals should welcome the individual scrutiny that non-compliance would bring, but in real terms it can be hugely damaging to staff morale, which can consequently impact their performance – feeling as though you yourself are under constant surveillance is not a desirable environment in which to work.
www.tomorrowscleaning.com
By this notion, a group monitoring solution that promotes the spirit of collective responsibility amongst healthcare teams is ideal – something non-intrusive so not to disrupt workflow, whilst being sophisticated enough to gather genuinely accurate data.
The answer then, is electronic auditing – a cost-effective method that is considerably more reliable than direct monitoring, capturing 100% of hand hygiene events, which provides operators with precise, quantified data that enables them to increase compliance. And these systems can be established into a medical facility in a way that bears no detrimental impact to the daily activities of medical staff. State-of- the-art electronic numeration can be incorporated into the dispensers, meaning that a wireless signal will activate any time the dispenser is used and be sent to a tracking server. Then, by means of pre-determined algorithms on the basis of factors such as the healthcare provider to patient ratio, it is possible to measure what is happening more accurately and determine whether it falls in line with compliance standards.
After any given timeframe in which the dispensers have been tracking usage, the data can be presented to operators in the form of easy-to-digest web-based reports – allowing them the insight to make informed decisions on how certain teams or departments can improve.
Then, by clearly displaying hand hygiene trends and statistics for each hospital unit, staff can collaborate on compliance improvement plans, set goals and ensure that as a team they are doing everything in their power to improve hand hygiene and thus, patient safety.
If a monitoring system is combined with an integrated hand hygiene programme, hospitals can go a long way towards controlling infections – and protecting the skin health of healthcare workers at the same time.
www.debgroup.com Tomorrow’s Cleaning | 37
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76
