search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
POLITICS


Unshackling business for growth


The Chamber has written to the Chancellor of the Exchequer, the Rt Hon Philip Hammond (pictured below), calling for a complete overhaul of the ‘broken’ business rates system. It is urging the Chancellor to use reform of


business rates to show his intention to unshackle business to encourage growth. Uniting with the British Chambers of


Commerce network, it is calling for a replacement of the current arrangement with something that recognises a firm’s ability to pay. And it is urging Government to remove its


demand for a cost-neutral alternative to the existing business rates system. In its letter, sent ahead of the Budget, the Chamber says that demanding cost-neutrality for central Government is “severely limiting” the scope of local authorities to achieve fundamental changes to the system, leaving officials able only to “tinker at the edges” of the problem. Removing the demand for cost-neutrality


would give policymakers working alongside the business community sufficient headroom to bring about fundamental change, the letter stressed. Chris Hobson, the Chamber’s Director of


Policy, said: “The guiding principal of reform must be to increase business survival, growth and investment – not just balance spreadsheets at the Exchequer. “The Chancellor had an opportunity in the


Budget to show his intentions to unshackle business for growth and we urged him to use it.” The Chamber also called for the switch from


Retail Price Index to Consumer Price Index as the basis for determining business rates increases each year – as suggested in the Chancellor’s Autumn Statement – to be brought forward from 2020 to this year. And it wants plant and machinery removed from property valuations for business rates assessment to encourage firms to invest even in uncertain times. Chris added: “We


believe this can be achieved as part of a wider simplification of the business rates system, possibly looking at the Dutch model where valuations are based on floor space, use class and benchmark properties.”


26 business network March 2017 The Chamber also called on Mr Hammond to


drop proposals to restrict the ability of the Valuation Tribunal for England to order changes to business rates liabilities. “If draft legislation is introduced as proposed,


a business rates payer could be required to significantly overpay for five years because the Valuation Tribunal for England will not have the power to correct matters,” Chris added. The letter acknowledged that the Chamber’s


Quarterly Economic Survey for the final three months of 2016 had showed members ending the year strongly but recognised that there were concerns about rising prices over the coming 12 months which would impact business margins and investment opportunities. It said that businesses recognised that much


of the debate on prospects to support the UK economy over the coming 12 months would take place against the backdrop of negotiations for the UK to leave the European Union. But it stressed that alongside the Brexit


negotiations, steps need to be taken to reinforce business confidence at home and to demonstrate that the UK remains a great place to do business. The letter said: “Any vision for a successful UK


economy outside the EU must be underpinned by a regulatory and tax environment conducive to good business. “A perennial complaint of Chamber members


is the cumulative impact of Government policy which brings with it a resource burden that increases the day-to-day costs of doing business, costs often driven by the unintended consequences of policy measures that are introduced without a full appreciation of the realities of implementation. “Examples of the above, raised by members in


recent consultations, include (but are not limited to) the Apprenticeship Levy, Pensions Auto- enrolment, Insurance Premium Tax, Dividend Tax, National Living Wage, Immigration Skills Charge, making tax digital, changes to National Insurance and restriction of travel and subsistence costs for small companies. “The Spring Budget provided an opportunity


for Government to demonstrate to business that it hears the message on this and is taking meaningful steps to reduce the increasingly


unbearable high input costs that businesses in the UK face, thereby releasing and freeing up the resources and time needed to pursue growth – there should be a commitment to the introduction of no new measures that increase the input costs on UK business.


Chris Hobson, the Chamber's Director of Policy


‘We urge the Chancellor to act on these requests without delay’


“However, the number one complaint the Chamber receives in this area is with regards to the broken business rates system, which hinders ambition, investment and growth.” The letter proposed four key measures the


Chancellor could take immediately to ease the burden of business rates. They were:


• Abandon the fiscal neutrality principle in business rates reform – an unacceptable barrier to fundamental reform of the business rates system that is unique to that tax


• Bring forward the switch from RPI to CPI, currently planned for April 2020, to April 2017


• Removal of all plant and machinery from the valuation of property for business rates purposes


• Drop proposals to restrict the ability of the Valuation Tribunal for England to order changes to business rates liabilities.


And it said the British Chambers of Commerce network was ready to support Government in successfully delivering a fundamentally reformed business rates system that:


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60