This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
040


DETAILS


Top Juicy Couture, Regent Street, London - as featured in mondo*arc 70 (Pic: Nick Guttridge); Colbert, Sloane Square, London (Pic: David Loftus); Superdry, Regent Street, London (Pic: Supergroup & Precision Lighting) Above DKNY, Bond Street, London (Pic: Chris Gascoigne); Red or Dead 30 Year Anniversary Exhibition, Old Truman Brewery, London (Pic: Red or Dead)


Just under two years ago Paul Nulty founded his lighting design practice Paul Nulty Light- ing Design (PNLD), based in London. Nulty and his team have a wealth of knowledge and practical expertise in providing the right lighting solutions for their clients, working in close collaboration with archi- tects and designers providing creative and innovative lighting design consultancy. PNLD has appeared on seven awards shortlists in those two years, so it seemed a good time to ask Nulty about what he’s been up to and what does ‘quality of light’ really mean to him? The designer was straight to the point. “Quality of light is about people and their perception, it isn’t about ticking the boxes, it isn’t really about whether it’s 1 or 2 McAdam ellipses, or CRI 95, or luminous intensity. It’s about how people relate to a space and the way a space is illuminated. If it works and people like it, then it’s the


right quality of light. It’s trying somehow to find a solution that fits. It’s also a rela- tive term, you need darkness to create contrast with the light, tonal and textural differences. You can’t have light without having space. You try and light a space for people and in order to aid that relationship between space and people you use pigeon holes, like CRI or intensity, and we use those criteria as a guide to light the spaces. As a manufacturer you might look at lots of factors like lumen output, efficacy, spectral output, colour rendering, colour consistency over lifetime, longevity, ease of installa- tion. But for a designer that’s not quality of light, that’s quality of product or service and it’s that difference that causes so many manufacturers who also offer ‘lighting design services’ to get it so wrong. Quality of light to me is lighting people and spaces to achieve a high quality of environment.


Everything else is just a means to an end.” The tipping point question for disrup- tive technologies like LED is when do they become good enough to be the technology of choice. In reality specifiers have to take into account so many different factors. Nulty says, “It’s not just quality of light – it’s quality of light relative to other ex- ternal factors such as capital expenditure. If you ask ‘is it okay to have low quality of light’ the answer is no, if the question is ‘is it okay to spend less money and have lower quality of light’, depending on the client brief the answer could be yes, if it’s good enough then it’s good enough.” At the project level, there are many other factors to deal with like buildability, maintainability, customer service, cost. The question on what is quality of light is a dif- ficult question to answer actually, as it’s so subjective.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164