Westminster watch
Gareth Morgan is a political lobbyist and director with Cavendish Communications (
www.cavendishpc.co.uk). He is an advisor to the Guild of Travel Management Companies (GTMC)
SURFACE TO AIR MISSIVES
It seems like everyone is playing plane politics...
SO, THERE WE HAVE IT. We know the shortlist of airport options that Sir Howard Davies’ Airports Commission will consider. It should be pretty simple now – Davies and his team will look into these in more depth, make their final recommendation and then the airport capacity issue is put to bed. Or not. In fact, the lobbying around the decision has stepped up a gear, and it is interesting to run through the various camps at play. First, we have the shortlisters – those who now have everything to play for. Gatwick and Heathrow have well-oiled machines already in play and full
For a process that was designed to take the politics out of the decision, we can actually see one that is crawling with different agendas
46
activity plans lined up – to the extent that one executive recently indicated to me there is a “mini-industry” at work at his airport. The left-field option is proposed by Heathrow Hub, to extend the northern runway – up to now an option that didn’t actually have the support of Heathrow Ltd itself. Then there’s the half-in, half-out contender. London mayor Boris Johnson used his sway to ensure that the Thames Estuary airport isn’t completely dead in the water. Rather, it was partially resuscitated for another six months and given a second chance to put forward the data supporting the concept. Johnson’s aviation adviser, Daniel Moylan, is doing the lobbying spade-work by touring Conservative constituency parties in London making the case. The main message from those who missed out on the final cut is that they aren’t giving up. Airports like Stansted continue to press to be
considered in the post-2030 phase through engaging with pro-business MPs. Meanwhile, Birmingham airport has orchestrated a campaign among West Midlands MPs calling for their airport to be allowed to add a second runway of their own before 2050. The nimbys – the 2M Group, consisting of 20 councils opposed to Heathrow expansion, and the anti-Heathrow community organisation HACAN – continue to stridently oppose expansion and use all their local links to ensure a steady stream of opposition coming from MPs in the area, to the extent that it is very hard for a political party to win in areas, such as Richmond, without being overtly ‘anti’.
The just-make-a-decision camp – mostly emanating from business organisations, such as London First – is promoting campaigns such as ‘Let Britain Fly’ that are looking for commitments from all political
parties to accept and implement the findings of Davies’ work. For them, regardless of the option selected, success is seeing any decision at all, and they have a team of in-house lobbyists seeking to ensure this issue isn’t parked for another decade. Finally, there remains a committed group of individuals and organisations who want the new hub (Heathrow) to connect into HS2. This is ostensibly about better-integrated transport, but many of its supporters are driven by the fact that such a route would mean areas like the Chilterns are spared the HS2 upheaval as is currently planned. Well-financed and well- connected, they are a force within the Conservative ranks and will make their move as the HS2 bill makes its way through parliament this spring. For a process that was designed to take the politics out of the decision, we can actually see one that is crawling with agendas, lobbyists, MPs, councils, mayors and advisors, all throwing considerable resource at making sure their own plans come to fruition. ■ See airports report, p52
MARCH/APRIL 2014
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128