Opinion According to AMON DWINDLING SUPPLY
Amon Cohen notes an appreciable shift towards demand management – and the simultaneous rise of the HR department...
A LOT OF THINGS were different when I started writing about travel management 20 years ago – having use for a comb and being able to play tennis without sitting down between games are two examples which spring to mind. But another change struck me when I wrote a feature on airline contracting for this edition of Buying Business Travel (p62). I realised its subject matter has become a rarity for me. I hardly ever knock out – I mean, carefully craft – articles on supplier management any more. Two decades ago, most of my output dealt with how to get better deals with carriers, hotels or car rental companies. These days, I am called upon much more to write about demand management – how businesses can improve their travel spend by steering employees more effectively towards making the right choices. And I’m not the only one: this very issue of BBT includes an article on demand management by my esteemed colleague Betty Low (p88). The same goes for
44
the various conference programmes I am involved in organising. Needless to say, I am always looking for travel managers to speak, and there are quite a few slots for travel management companies, consultants and technology companies, too, but now we call only on a handful of suppliers to step up to the platform. In fact, looking through my contacts book, I realise most of the airline and car rental execs, and hoteliers I used to talk to are retired or dead. There are some very big brands where I don’t know anyone at all any more. Let’s assume for a minute that my experience has
some wider validity beyond the personal. What does the shift in subject matter tell us, except that I’m not scoring as many free hotel nights or rental cars as I used to? Well, one inference is that maybe corporate clients aren’t getting as much out of supplier deals as they used to either. One travel manager observes in the feature that airline sales people at some carriers are little more than messengers these days, because revenue management departments have assumed responsibility for determining
happens to employees on the move, even down to the tax liabilities they incur (a subject I expect to become more noticed in 2014), is becoming a hotter and hotter topic. Finally, there is the question of getting the most out of your employees. Extraordinary as it may seem at a time when so many graduates are struggling to find work, certain sectors (oil and gas is one) and countries are apparently struggling to attract and retain top talent. Getting travel policy right to deal with this worry
I realise most of the airline and car rental execs, and hoteliers I used to talk to are retired or dead
pricing. Consequently, there is very little flexibility for the sales person and the client to hammer out a deal. And, of course, the opposite is also true. Suppliers feel they can’t get as much out of their corporate clients as they did. Travellers have access to excellent internet search engines which instantly show them if a better fare is available than the one offered through the official managed travel channel. Related to this shift from
supply to demand management, I hear a small but influential number of people tipping human resources (HR) departments to become much more dominant in travel management. If demand management is becoming paramount, then HR dominance makes sense because that is the department which specialises in managing employees. Another reason offered
for a move towards HR is that risk management issues increasingly influence corporate strategic thinking. Ensuring nothing untoward
is clearly a job for HR. I have even seen some theorising that business travellers need to be treated as human assets. Therefore, the thinking goes, travel managers can work with HR to strategise and budget better deployment of these assets as they plan global expansion and forecast what value travel would bring back to the company. That last idea certainly is a bit woolly for now, but you can start to see why HR is beginning to be talked up in some quarters as the next overlord for travel. That position has belonged since roughly the beginning of the noughties to procurement. Fifteen years later, is the purchasing department about to wave goodbye to travel?
I’VE GOT NOTHING AGAINST Michael O’Leary personally. I don’t recall ever encountering a serious delay on a Ryanair flight and, professionally, he’s been kind enough to fuel hundreds of column inches for me through his antics. He
even rang me up in person once, when I hadn’t actually requested an interview with him. His PR department had informed him I was writing an article for the Financial Times about criticisms of Ryanair by the now-defunct Air Transport Users Council. O’Leary hated that institution almost as much as he hates the European Commission, and he was only too happy to call me to vent his verbal spleen. I was only too happy to write it all down. Having said that, I can’t help
feeling no one is going to take Ryanair’s new touchy-feely, corporate travel-friendly attitude seriously until Mr O’Leary has left the building. Can anyone in the travel industry, or indeed passengers, have much faith in his apparently Damascene conversion to customer service, given how convincingly he has gone out of the way to be so bloody-minded about so many things that he knows wind up customers over so many years?
OVER THE PAST COUPLE OF YEARS, there has been a dawning realisation that corporate travel technology lags behind consumer technology, whether it’s booking or expense tools, or mobile apps. Having been out and about at various shows and conferences over the past couple of weeks, it looks like that gap is at last starting to narrow, even in the products designed for travel managers rather than their travellers. That’s great news for companies at the forefront of this revolution; bad news for those who are behind it. The bar is much higher now. If a corporate travel technology tool is not as slick and quick as Amazon or Google, its days may well be numbered. ■
MARCH/APRIL 2014
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128