OFF TRACK SPOKES
Should bicycle businesses support city cycling or sportives?
Carlton Reid pitches in to the ding-dong battle between a bike advocate and the executive director of the Bicycle Association
SOME BIKE advocates sneer at Sustrans for creating a bicycle route network that often needs car-park access, with families driving to a honeypot route rather than riding there. Some bike advocates think SkyRide-style roped-off city rides are sell-outs for making people wear helmets and hi-vis vests. Some bike advocates think Lycra-clad charity challenge rides portray cycling as a, well, challenge and deter people from cycling to work in ordinary clothes. Me? I’m just happy to see people on bikes. I don’t care
whether they’re mountain bikes, road bikes, BMX, unicycles, penny farthings, CXers, 29ers, DHers or recumbents. It takes all sorts and no one sector of cycling is “real” cycling. It’s all cycling (although tricyclists may stiffen at that). So the criticism levelled at the Bicycle Association’s Phillip Darnton by blogger Danny Williams – that the bicycle industry doesn’t do enough for advocacy and should be pushing for segregated bicycle infrastructure for cites – misses the fact that cycling is far bigger than city cycling. Cyclists are dying on the roads of Britain and, in many
ways, that’s criminal, but cyclists also die on off-road rides, and time triallists put up with crazy risks by cycling on dual carriageways (sadly, some die). Transport cycling might be the major focus of many advocates but the Bicycle Association has to represent all sectors of the industry. The BA doesn’t demand velodromes, BMX tracks, MTB trail centres or other facilities for cycling. Via the Bike Hub levy, the BA encourages children to cycle so that they and their parents buy more bicycles. These children may turn out to be MTBers, roadies or
everyday cyclists. Doesn’t matter. What’s important is that they’re cycling. The cycle industry is run on capitalist principles (mostly, there’s also an element of passion and sheer enthusiasm) and, in a time of austerity, keeping any sort of levy going is very tough indeed. What Phillip Darnton didn’t mention in his answer to Danny Williams was that monies from the Bike Hub levy
Wondering what the Twitterati have been up to this month? Look no further...
In the spirit of breaking laws only a little bit, we should be
allowed to give Tory ministers a slap. It’d boost business.
@BenCooper
Have to say, from a purely aesthetic point of view, 650b
just looks right #controversial @_si _bradley
Sending a Backflip is by far the best way to recover from being
*have* been been spent on city cycling projects. The Bike Hub levy’s Big Ideas Fund spent £100,000 developing Darlington’s Beauty and the bike Dutch-bike project and on encouraging more cycle commuting in some northern cities. Part of the same funding round was also provided to Age Well On Wheels, a ‘silver cycling’ project run by the London Cycling Campaign. If advocates – or existing organisations – approached the Bicycle Association with well-thought out plans for bicycle infrastructure projects I’m sure they would be welcomed. But should the BA spend levy money on this sort of thing? Isn’t that the Government’s job? (Not that the Government does much in this regard, mind). Maybe the Bike Hub levy should fund the sort of urban MTB trail centre projects that I mentioned last month? If there’s some cash knocking about I’d quite like a pump track. One of the biggest growth areas in cycling is the
sportive sector. Maybe the Bike Hub levy could subsidise a closed-road sportive somewhere scenic? That would get lots more people cycling. Money in the till. Thing is, cycling is such a broad church it’s impossible to fund everything. The commuter market is clearly lucrative to bike suppliers and bike shops but city cycling cannot be the sole focus for the industry association.
EDITORIAL: 01992 535646 | ADVERTISING: 01992 535647 | FAX: 01992 535648
Executive Editor: Carlton Reid
Carlton.Reid@
intentmedia.co.uk
Editor: Jonathon Harker
Jonathon.Harker@intentmedia.co.uk
Deputy Editor: Mark Sutton
Mark.Sutton@
intentmedia.co.uk
Sales Executive: Jake Adams
Jake.Adams@
intentmedia.co.uk
Design: Dan Bennett
Dan.Bennett@
intentmedia.co.uk
LATEST NEWS STRAIGHT TO YOUR MOBILE | BOOKMARK US:
MOBILE.BIKEBIZ.COM 90 BIKEBIZ AUGUST
Production Executive: Alice Sanz
Alice.Sanz@
intentmedia.co.uk
Publisher: Lisa Carter
Lisa.Carter@
intentmedia.co.uk
Managing Director: Stuart Dinsey
Stuart.Dinsey@intentmedia.co.uk
Marketing & Circulation: Lianne Davey
Lianne.Davey@intentmedia.co.uk
Editorial Saxon House, 6A, St. Andrew Street, Hertford, Hertfordshire. SG14 1JA
BikeBiz is mailed FOC to 4,000+ trade addresses every month ISSN 1476-1505
taken out on the first straight at the world champs.
@EvansBMX
A very nice customer just bought me an ice cream!
#rockon @BobsBikesHull
Do not go where the path may lead; go instead where
there is no path and leave a trail. @CyclingSurgeon
SUBSCRIPTIONS UK: £50 Europe: £60 Rest of World: £90
BikeBiz is published 12 times a year by Intent Media – Saxon House, 6a St. Andrew Street, Hertford, Hertfordshire SG14 1JA
Intent Media Subscriptions Department PO Box 35, Robertsbridge, TN32 5WN Tel: 01580 883848, Fax: 01580 883849
If you or one of your colleagues would like to request a subscription to BikeBiz, please email
bike.subscriptions@
c-cms.com or call 01580 883848. Please note that this is a controlled circulation title and subscription criteria will be strictly adhered to.
Intent Media is a member of the Audit Bureau of Circulation and the Periodical
Publishers Association
© Intent Media 2013 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage or retrieval system without the express prior written consent of the publisher. The contents of BikeBiz are subject to reproduction in information storage and retrieval systems. Printed by The Manson Group, AL3 6PZ
Pic © Clair McMullen
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92