This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Rolling stock


the Desiro City. Thameslink is, of course, one of those very large infrastructure projects mentioned earlier in this piece and as Rail Professional went to press, the Department for Transport had just confirmed its decision to award the £1.6 billion contract to Siemens and Cross London Trains. We are now in the Alcatel standstill period* which will last at least ten days. There’s been a huge amount of speculation and comment on the Thameslink project but I think it’s worth saying: yes it’s been a hugely complex deal, yes it has taken a while to conclude but frankly it was important to everyone to get this right. The Desiro City is an outstanding train.


And it’s an outstanding train that has been designed for the UK, using UK-sourced components and the feedback of UK operators and maintainers with its base on proven technology. Siemens has 13,500 UK employees, we’ve been in the UK for 170 years and we are really proud to be bringing the Desiro City to market. It’s a platform that will help the UK commuter market evolve once again and will help achieve that ultimate goal of increased capacity with better passenger comfort and lower lifecycle costs. I’m sure I’m not alone when I say I


can see an exciting future for the UK rail industry. I’ve spoken with many overseas railway professionals who have huge admiration for our industry in the UK. So do I, so do all our rail-focused employees whether they work in rolling stock supply,


maintenance and operation, signalling and automation or rail electrification. And it’s one that Siemens is committed to playing a big part in. Steve Scrimshaw is managing director UK & North West Europe, Siemens Rail Systems. Alcatel mandatory standstill period is a period of at least ten calendar days following


the notification of an award decision in a contract tendered via the Official Journal of the European Union, before the contract is signed with the successful supplier(s). Its purpose is to allow unsuccessful bidders to challenge the decision before the contract is signed.


July/August 2013 Page 65


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148