This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Opinion


Institute of Directors


Changing the route of the southern end of HS2 after so much work has already been done may seem like an admission of failure. But in reality, it is key to making both high speed rail and aviation a success believes Corin Taylor


I


n a famous Yes Minister episode, the unfortunate Jim Hacker is offered the title of Transport Supremo and told to introduce an integrated transport policy. After his first fruitless meeting with the heads of the rail, road and air divisions of the transport department, Hacker spends the rest of the episode desperately trying to avoid his new responsibilities. Before too long, the integrated transport policy is dumped, the minister returns to administrative affairs, and everyone breathes a sigh of relief.


Thirty years on, deep breaths are still being taken, with


Transport Secretaries coming and going at the rate of about one every 18 months. But the results are more often tragic than comic. And nowhere is this more evident than in the woeful lack of integration between rail and air. For decades, the Great Western Main Line ran just over a mile north of Heathrow, without a station to serve the airport. Now, of course, it is possible to take a premium service to the airport from London, but not from Reading or cities further west. And the new plans to build a western rail link still put Heathrow at the end of a branch line, rather than at the heart of a main line. At the same time, we are about to embark on Britain’s biggest ever rail investment while making an entirely separate decision over the future of our hub airport. Sir Humphrey would have been proud. Fortunately, there is plenty of innovative thinking going on in the private sector about how to connect airports with railway lines. Although the most eye-catching proposal has been for a new high speed orbital railway to link up with a new airport east of London, the most practical and the most transformative is at Britain’s largest airport to the west.


One coherent scheme


The ‘Heathrow Hub’ plan tears up the patchwork of improvements to Heathrow’s surface access and replaces them with one coherent scheme. There are four key elements. First, a new station on the Great Western Main Line, just to the east of the M25. This would bring direct, no-change services to Heathrow from all cities on the Great Western line, including Reading, Swindon, Bristol, Cardiff and Exeter. Second, a new airport terminal immediately above the railway line, which would involve the demolition of a golf course but no houses. Upon leaving the train, passengers would check in directly, pass through security and transfer onto a fast airside tracked transit, which would take them directly to their aircraft satellite. This would also allow the demolition of Terminal 4, improving the layout of the airport.


Third, changing the route of HS2 so that it runs through the Heathrow Hub station, before roughly following the route of


July/August 2013 Page 23


the M40 northwards. This would link all cities connected to the planned HS2 with frequent direct services to Heathrow, including Birmingham, Manchester, Liverpool, Sheffield, Leeds and Newcastle. By running alongside existing transport corridors, it would also follow the successful principles of the HS1 line. Fourth, a direct link between HS1 and HS2, with no need to interchange. This would provide direct connections between Heathrow and cities on the HS1 route, including the other side of the Channel Tunnel. And it would provide easy interchange


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148