This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
BUSINESS MONITOR


Bad taste is difficult to define – we know it when we see it or hear it, but it’s extremely subjective. What raises one person’s hackles causes another merely to shrug. So when it comes to


promotions, it’s a case of proceed with caution. PAUL CLAPHAM has some tips on how to get it right, every time . . .


. . . All done in the best


possible taste G


iven that huge breadth of human sensitivities, how concerned should marketers and their suppliers be


about the bad taste? After all, marketing is nothing if its messages donʼt engage the emotions of the target audience. Make a message so anodyne that nobody could possibly object and you have no engagement, no sale. So should we be concerned about bad taste? The answer has to be yes. This column was prompted by two pieces of insensitivity. First, Scott Fresenerʼs T-biz Network offered an 11% discount on 11/11/11 to all forcesʼ veterans. Superficially, this looks like good marketing but clearly nobody asked the question ʻDoes the deep solemnity of Armistice Day fit with an essentially frivolous discount?ʼ Then there was Activision Blizzard who launched the big selling shoot-em-up video game, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 in the same Remembrance Week. Kevin Maher, a columnist for the Times, described this as ʻera-defining bad tasteʼ. They doubtless had both eyes on the Christmas trade rather than the immediate calendar in November when the launch date was chosen. Tastelessness matters increasingly because of social network sites and the web in general. The complaints you might get can no longer be buried – they will be seen by customers potentially in their millions. For every person who posts


www.printwearandpromotion.co.uk


negative comment a hundred think the same but donʼt bother and another hundred may read the posts. But, come on, this is the 21st century! Daytime TV is full of shock jocks. Music


“Some of the poorest taste messages you will see in public are printed on T shirts. On the one hand, you have a commercial market where demand will be filled by someone else if not you. On the other hand, you want the industry as a whole to enhance its status, to be taken seriously. The two are not exactly compatible.”


videos are one stop short of pornography. Alternative comedians (many of them now mainstream) make a living out of jokes that push the boundaries of good taste, not to mention language. And most people laugh. Equally, have you listened to the lyrics on a rap album recently? All true. But marketing, including printwear, is supposed to be a grown-up


business. Justification for poor taste by invoking the lowest common denominator is no justification. But Iʼm a simple garment decorator, not involved in choosing sensitive launch dates or creating emotionally charged messages; I just print them.


OK, but I suggest that if any marketing supplier had said to Activision Blizzard: “It might be a good idea to bring that launch date forward four days so weʼre in the week before Armistice Day”, their stock would have risen. The biggest corporations can lose perspective.


rintwear can be in something of a cleft stick on this issue. Some of the poorest taste messages you will see in public are printed on T shirts. On the one hand, you have a commercial market where demand will be filled by someone else if not you. On the other hand, you want the industry as a whole to enhance its status, to be taken seriously. The two are not exactly compatible.


P


This can impact on the business in two ways. The marketing manager targeting students for a bank, who might well consider buying printwear, could be dissuaded by seeing images of drunken students sporting those joke shirts. Similarly, if the marketing manager of a brewery or pub group takes a look at your website and sees the ever-popular “Iʼm


■ Continued over page. February 2012 | 21 |


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92