This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Matt Martinez Oregon State suffered its poorest season in Mike Riley’s nine years


as head coach. The Beavers can point with optimism, however, to freshman quarterback Sean Mannion. He passed for more yards in 2011 than any other Beavers’ quarterback not named Derek An- derson. Wide receivers James Rodgers and Markus Wheaton gave Mannion a pair of outstanding pass catchers. Under fourth-year coach Paul Wulff, Washington State showed


marked improvement over its teams of the past several seasons. Injuries forced the team to start three different players at quarter- back, but young players such as wide receiver Marquess Wilson and running back Rickey Galvin emerged as stars. The Cougars began the year with three victories in four games, and, late in the year, they dealt Arizona State’s South Division hopes a severe blow with a 37–27 upset. In between, though, Washington State faltered. That left Stanford and Oregon to battle for supremacy in the North. First-year coach


78


David Shaw’s Cardinal averaged 48.2 points per game while bulldoz- ing its fi rst nine opponents. Stanford didn’t even trail in any of its fi rst seven victories. The Ducks, meanwhile, stumbled in a turnover- plagued defeat in its opener against LSU, then reeled off nine victo- ries in which they averaged 49.1 points per game. Oregon won the showdown with the Cardinal 53–30. Two weeks


later, head coach Chip Kelly’s Ducks offi cially clinched the North by beating Oregon State 49–21 in the Civil War. In the South Division, the road to the Championship Game was


fi lled with a lot more twists and turns. The race was complicated by USC’s ineligibility for the Conference championship. At fi rst, that didn’t appear to matter when Arizona State threatened to run away with the division. Head coach Dennis Erickson’s Sun Devils throttled USC 43–22 in week four and soon took control of the division. They had a chance to all but wrap up the title offi cially when they played at UCLA in week nine, but Rick


University of Utah Athletics


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116