search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
GRADING CRAFT


POST . . .L ANDSCAPERS


THE LOOK’S THOMAS URBYE WAS BEHIND THE GRADE FOR THE AWARD WINNING TRUE CRIME COMEDY DRAMA, LANDSCAPERS, PRODUCED BY SISTER AND SOUTH OF THE RIVER FOR SKY AND HBO


Initially we had a call to pitch for the project with DP Erik Wilson BSC, Director Will Sharpe, Producer Katie Carpenter and Harry Munday. Both Erik and Will were very clear that they wanted to be able to do the grading and the complex layered dissolves within the same system, as they had struggled with this at other facilities. I was able to reassure them that would be the case with us, and so the next stage was camera and LUT tests.


Erik was keen to adopt some very specific looks that were reminiscent of the original Three & Two-strip Technicolor formats. Sharing film stock resources with me, we were able to recreate these ‘looks’ for use with the Sony Venice camera working in slog3/sgamut3 by utilising a number of unusual colour processes that required mathematical RGB/CMY calculations. Erik was able to use these during the shoot and that in turn set the look during editorial. References included Mr Cabe & Mrs Miller for episode four.


Varying levels of digital grain that I developed in-house with our developer were also brought into the live grade dependent on narrative in scenes.


Carefully controlled lens aberrations when working with spherical vs anamorphic lenses were all done by me in the grading suite to ensure creative intention and matching between different lenses, rather than move to another system. Other formats used in the shoot included 16mm, CCTV and miniDV. All were colour managed into slog3/sgamut3 for later HBO archival. A small amount of the Venice media and graphic titles were projected digitally at the end of the first pass grade, recaptured on 16mm, scanned, and dropped back in and regraded!


It was important these formats and varying looks served the story. At times they transition with complex dissolves which required delicate grading and layered overlays. Transitions sometimes went on for many seconds and used various blend modes, working in conjunction with dynamic grades. Due to the nature of the story, there is a present day look (Three-strip), as well as flashbacks (black and white) and the


final episode played out as a Western (Two-strip), so the look most certainly supports the storytelling!


The grade was carried out at UHD SDR as the blends were too complex for a HDR to SDR Dolby Vision conversion. The SDR LUT was swapped out for a slog3/sgamut3 to Rec2020 PQ LUT and then scene and shot eye matched against the SDR version with Erik in attendance. There are only minor differences - slightly richer skintones in HDR, and more dynamic range in highlights but otherwise not a dramatic difference. The HDR version still had a Dolby Vision analysis done for correct HDR presentation on Sky & HBO’s streaming platform.


Erik went on to win both the 2022 BSC and BAFTA for Best Cinematography in a TV series, with BAFTA Best Director and mini-series nominations as well and I won the RTS Picture Enhancement Award and was nominated for the Filmlight Colour Award.


“Erik was keen to adopt some very


specific looks that were reminiscent of the original Three & Two-strip Technicolor formats.”


Thomas Urbye, Colourist, Landscapers Summer 2023 televisual.com 93


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112