search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
DIRECTING CRAFT


PRODUCTION


DANIEL NETTHEIM


CREDITS The Tourist; Boat Story; Line of Duty; Broadchurch; The Messenger; Cursed; Safe; Doctor Who; Ripper Street; Humans; Tidelands; Glue


casarotto.co.uk


I’ve got to be engaged in the script. I often ask myself “would I be into the show as an audience member?” If I feel I wouldn’t watch it, it’s probably not for me. I ask, “is it well conceived and well written?” But then ultimately, do I feel like I can an add value? Are there clear ways I can see that I can bring something to it? I’m looking for strong material that I can also forge a personal connection with.


When I first get the script, it’s about tapping into my first


What I like to do during pre is work towards a walkthrough about a week or so before the start of principal photography whereby myself, the DP, production designer and usually the costume designer have shortlisted all our references, put them into a cohesive document and then pinned it to the production office wall. And then we do a walkthrough usually with the producers, the execs, ideally the commissioners, any crew who have started, particularly the first AD team, even cast if they’re around. We talk through the ideas and we show them


instincts. You only ever get to read the script for the first time once. So, you only ever get one chance to jot down your first reactions, both positive and negative. What do I love about it? What do I feel doesn’t work? On second and subsequent reads, you become a little bit immune to that so it’s really useful to go back and see the notes that you’ve scribbled on the script. I think first instincts are really valid.


the documents because it’s a really great opportunity to pull everyone together and that also allows for further modification. You can finesse, and another part of that process is making sure that nobody is surprised by what they see in the first day’s rushes. Or not unpleasantly surprised at least.


I will do what I can to create time with the actors. I love to hear their first instincts. I like to share my own instincts of how that character might fit into the bigger picture of the story or the episode but, ultimately, I want each actor to have ownership of their character. I rely on them to know that character better than I do while I rely on myself to know the overall jigsaw puzzle of the episode or the series. I love to see what the actor is going to bring to it without being tainted too much by any words from me. I will step in if I need to. I don’t think there’s a wrong interpretation but there are interpretations that are going to be more or less helpful for cutting the thing together. But


even with the most experienced actors, you want them to know that they’re being watched, that I’m there as an audience member for them and that I’m prepared to calibrate or offer thoughts if I feel it could be pushed in different directions.


I have an ever-evolving vision of the finished product in my mind that I can plug into for any question that comes my way. And I can calibrate that vision for any suggestions and input. But there is always a vision there. In a way that vision is an amorphous thing. It’s hard to communicate all aspects of it in a document because it involves sound and music, what I think may or may not happen in the edit room and subtle things about tone. It’s all stuff that’s been thought out, it may have been written in various documents during pre, but it’s all there. And I think that’s why maintaining focus on set and focus on that vision is probably one of the most exhausting and draining parts of being a director.


Summer 2023 televisual.com 77


Daniel Nettheim image credit: Ian Routledge


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112