ADVERTORIAL
STEADY AS SHE GOES
In the world of stabilization technology there is not one size fits all. Sleipner discuss the options available dependent on vessel size and projected usage
F
or naval architects and boat builders, choosing a stabilizer system has traditionally meant making some tough choices. How much stabilization force can be achieved before the
impact on speed and fuel consumption becomes unacceptable? Additionally, it’s not always clear what type of stabilization to choose, as the two leading technologies (fins and gyros) have significant functional differences.
Understanding the basics Gyro-type stabilizers are installed inside the boat and get their total roll reduction force from the precession motion they generate to resist a boat’s roll. This also means they have the same absolute force regardless of wave period and boat speed; when the precession motion reaches the end of its travel, there is no more force available in that direction.
Fin stabilizers act in the water and have two ways of creating roll reduction force, depending on the boat’s speed. At zero speed, the fins rotate rapidly (flap) to generate force and, like the gyro, have a definite limit and stops when they reach the end of their travel.
However, when the boat moves forward, fins also generate roll reduction forces by the angle at which they pass through the water, like adjustable airplane wings or underwater foils. This force increases by speed squared, so the faster the boat moves, the more force they generate. Crucially, they can hold this force for as long as the boat keeps moving forward.
The invention of the curved stabilizer fins has, by some, been called a stabilizer revolution. This simple but highly effective solution eliminates many of the traditional trade-offs naval architects
and boat builders had to accept in the past. Vector fins™ create lift underway, reducing the boat’s hull drag by approximately the same amount as the drag the fins create, making it a break-even scenario. In some cases, this even results in a small gain in speed and fuel efficiency.
Key things to consider when choosing stabilizer technology • Choose stabilization technology to match the boating the owner will be doing.
• Check the practical limitations – not all systems will fit all boats, mainly due to space limitations.
• Consider what is best suited to your boat and what is likely to retain the most value when the time comes to sell – some sizes and yacht designs lean more towards one technology.
Spin it or fin it?
If your only priority is zero speed stabilization, the gyro will work just fine. However, suppose you also use your boat on longer cruises and want to have excellent stabilization when cruising in the open sea between sheltered anchorages. In that case, fins have a colossal force benefit. They can reduce or eliminate many times the wave height and length of a gyro of this size.
You can, of course, choose a bigger gyro (or multiple smaller ones) to increase the cruising capability, but this is when size and weight start to make an impact – to match the fins at eight knots, you need to more than quadruple the size of a gyro. Alternatively, you can choose bigger fins to match the gyro performance at zero speed.
There are undoubtedly many other considerations when choosing between the principles of fins or gyro stabilizers, and yet more to weigh up when comparing different brands. Still, it ultimately comes down to having enough force available when you need it.
For more details Tel: +47 69 30 00 60 or visit
www.sleipner.no
ONBOARD | WINTER 2021 | 179
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212
