search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Park News


in association with


Park Hoppin’ with Paul Ruben


Rebuild the Oldies. Really?


maintenance they required shortened their useful existence. Kyriazi suggests that their designs could be reproduced as hybrid coasters by Rocky Mountain Construction (RMC). Track maintenance for hybrid coasters is greatly reduced compared to the legendary woodies. RMC has made a living


E


by improving existing coasters that had either become boring or rough. Six Flags Magic Mountain’s Colossus was reimagined as Twisted Colossus, a longer and better ride. Cedar Point’s Mean Streak reemerged as Steel Vengeance, a much more thrilling ride, shown here. Six Flags Over Texas’s Texas Giant became smoother and hotter as the New Texas Giant. But I was fascinated by the prospect of the reappearance of, for example,


the Crystal Beach Cyclone. It is considered by many to be the most extreme roller coaster ever built. The ride lasted only 40 seconds after cresting the lift hill. Opened in 1926, it was the only coaster to have a full-time nurse on duty at the loading platform, and with good reason. As riders plunged down the first 97-foot (30m) drop, the track veered 85º to the right. Passengers lost hats, purses, combs, and false teeth. They were thrown into their riding partners, cracking ribs. Many fainted. The layout was nearly void of any straight track and consisted of one extreme turn after another. To replace one rotted board, 100 feet of track would have to be removed, so maintenance was difficult. By the end of its 20 years of operation, many more people were watching the legendary Crystal Beach Cyclone than riding it. I wasn’t old enough to ride the Crystal Beach Cyclone when the ride was dismantled, but I’ve long wished I had ridden it. So wouldn’t a new hybrid version by RMC be wonderful? The more I thought, the more I thought maybe not. Here’s why. The charm of the Cyclone started with its villainous black colour scheme. The restraint system was such you had to hold on or possibly loose your seat. There was a lot of side thrust, the source of the broken ribs. Rebuilt today, it could still be painted an ominous black, but you would need to securely keep riders in their seats. Bursts of heavy side thrust are rarely found on today’s rides. Without side thrust and without the fear of leaving the train mid-ride, what do you have? A fast, smooth coaster that will be fun to ride. But it would not require the bravery to meet the challenge that the original Cyclone required. In other words, the old classic coasters would have to be rebuilt to modern


safety standards. They wouldn’t be as thrilling, or fearful, as the originals, but they would be


safer. Or to put it another way, you could rebuild the originals exactly as they were, but you couldn’t afford the liability insurance. We like today’s roller coasters exactly as they are. Fast, thrilling, and safe.


NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2018


lsewhere in this issue (page 64) Gary Kyriazi makes the case for bringing back some classic and legendary wooden roller coasters. These early coasters were heavily twisted and the amount of track


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138