search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
MACAU BUSINESS A broader question concerns the way the new concession


contracts and the operators’ commitments will be encompassed in China’s national development plans, namely those designated for Macau: One Centre (of world tourism and leisure), One Platform (for economic relations with Portuguese- speaking countries), and One Base (for cultural exchange among different cultures, with Chinese culture being the mainstream), as explained in the Greater Bay Area (GBA) regional integration plan. Within this framework, what can be assigned to gaming operators? Each operator “can contribute to these goals, namely by carrying out investments and developing MICE, and supporting more cultural events” or by investing internationally, with Macau as a base. Since Ho Iat Seng has set his sights on Hengqin as a “Second


Macau”, it is likely that gaming companies will be encouraged or required to invest in the neighbouring island with gains obtained in Macau, Ramirez suggests. The investment requirements put forth at large by the


Government will be interwoven with the length of the future concessions. In 2001, the gaming law set a maximum duration of 20 years. Will this be replicated this time around? Some analysts are floating the idea of halving the concessions’ length. Wang Changbin, director of the Centre for Gaming and Tourism Studies at the Macao Polytechnic Institute (IPM), made the case for 10-year-long licenses in an article published in the Las Vegas Gaming Law Journal. “A 10-year concession should generally be long enough for an operator to develop a large-scale project, while a review and a renewal every five years extends the government’s flexibility to make some changes if necessary”, Wang elaborated. The scholar


     


argued that, while the 20-year period served the interests of the operators well, making sure that “the concessionaires make a profit from the concession”, it made it “difficult for the government to replace a possibly unsatisfied concessionaire or introduce more operators to the market in a timely manner”. Alidad Tash also contemplates the possibility of the 20-year span being reduced. “If so, ten years should be the minimum. Anything shorter makes the entire re-bidding process a perpetual one”, he argues. Carlos Siu Lam establishes a clear link between the amount and the type of investment which gaming companies will engage in and the contracts’ length. “I think the contract duration depends on what Macao wants to achieve, and what roles and amount of investments are expected from the concessionaires. If there are substantial investment requirements, the contract needs to last for some time to justify their investment”, he stresses. Ben Lee also highlights the same kind of connection. For


instance, “if an emphasis was to be placed on non-gaming investment, such as theme parks or other large-scale entertainment facilities, it would be extremely difficult to justify those sorts of investments on a ten-year horizon, thus rendering a continuation of the 20 years’ concession a likelihood.” If we do witness a repeat of a maximum 20-year period, it


would take us to 2042, just seven years short of the special 50-year period agreed in the Sino-Portuguese Joint Declaration on the Macau Question. Why not stretching a few more years? Jorge Oliveira points out that the length of the concessions is a political decision, not a technical one. “If the final term of the new concessions is [up to] twenty years, they will end in June 2042; perhaps it is wiser to consider 19 December 2049 as a final term”, concludes Oliveira, who heads the JCO consultancy and served as Portugal’s vice-minister for foreign trade and investment between 2015 and 2017. Meanwhile, as authorities remain tight-lipped and keep the


cards very close to their chest on the gaming law review and the future public tender, and amid the uncertainties resulting from the economic downturn and an unpredictable external environment - what should casino operators do? Alidad Tash recommends “behaving like a good corporate citizen”, by embracing or enhancing “more non-gaming elements in your integrated resorts (even if they lose money)”, placing more locals in upper senior management, holding more charitable activities around Macau and, never forget, “praising the wisdom and generosity of the central and local governments at every opportunity”.


24 OCTOBER 2020


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78