search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
CONSOLIDATION


The shipbuilding sector has been battling the dry spell for some time, which has driven some industry majors to join forces and consolidate ranks.


This has been the case with Japanese shipbuilders which are faced with fierce competition from South Korea and China. The consolidation wave among Japanese shipbuilders has been in progress since 2016, with Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) launching talks to form alliances with three compatriot shipbuilders – Imabari Shipbuilding, Oshima Shipbuilding and Namura Shipbuilding.


The downturn has seen China merge its top shipbuilders China State Shipbuilding Corporation (CSSC) and China Shipbuilding Industry Company (CSIC).


Meanwhile, South Korean top builders, Hyundai Heavy Industries and Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering (DSME), are undergoing a regulatory review of their proposed merger.


OUTLOOK


The pandemic has hit European shipbuilders, predominantly engaged in the constriction of cruise and RoRo vessels, extremely hard, as yards face construction delays from cruise liners and seek to secure financing for continuation of activity on existing ships. Since the beginning of this year, we have seen German shipbuilder FSG file for insolvency and more recently Kleven Verft filing for bankruptcy after a loan termination.


Operations at STX Offshore & Shipbuilding Co. in Korea ground to a halt after unions launched a general strike on June 1 calling for an end of unpaid furloughs, as reported by the Korea Herald. The cost-cutting measures impacting the workforce are being pursued as the shipbuilder failed to secure any new orders since the beginning of this year.


Aside from COVID-19 related impact on new ordering, there is also the issue of vessel overcapacity in the industry at a time when demand is constrained, particularly in the container shipping sector. BIMCO’s data shows that in the last three years of the past decade, demand outgrew the fleet as the TEU capacity of the fleet grew by 75.6% whereas demand measured in volumes was up 46.1%.


This imbalance left the container shipping market in a worse condition at the end of the decade than at the start.


So, how do we save the shipbuilding industry from going bust if ordering of new ships is not the solution?


Restricted demand growth prospects coupled with overcapacity across shipping markets are clear indicators that the industry must up its efforts when it comes to demolition and retiring old, inefficient fleet. On the other hand, with the growing pressure for the industry to cut its emissions and decarbonize there is also the need to build greener and more technologically advanced ships.


The survival of shipbuilding companies is likely to depend on the shipbuilders’ ability to rise to the occasion and speed up the construction of zero-emission ships. Be it hydrogen, ammonia, or electrically powered, one this is certain: the clock on decarbonizing is ticking and the time has come to make that giant step into the future.


Returning to ‘business as usual’ is not an option, and the new reality of demand downturn and economic troubles shows that for shipbuilding it will probably mean the survival of the toughest and most innovative.


The Report • September 2020 • Issue 93 | 91


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112