The safety debate after the 2024 Sydney to Hobart tragedy
The 2024 Sydney to Hobart Yacht Race will be remembered not only for its ferocious conditions but also for the tragic loss of two sailors, Nick Smith and Roy Quaden, on the very first night. As 30-40 knot winds roared and 5m swells battered the fleet, their deaths have reignited a heated debate about the race’s safety protocols and the balance between adventure and responsibility in competitive sailing.
The fleet of over 100 yachts set out on Boxing Day in near-perfect conditions, but as night fell, the Bass Strait lived up to its treacherous reputation. The weather rapidly deteriorated, forcing several boats to retire with equipment failure or crew exhaustion. Tragically, Smith, aboard the yacht Bowline, and Quaden, from Flying Fish Arctos, lost their lives during the chaos. Details remain scarce, but these incidents highlight the perilous nature of offshore racing. The Sydney to Hobart Yacht Race has always been a test of endurance and skill, earning its place among the world’s premier ocean races. However, its history is marred by danger. The 1998 disaster, which claimed six lives, led to a comprehensive overhaul of safety protocols. From improved lifejackets and storm sails to mandatory training for crew, the lessons of that year seemed to pave the way for safer racing. Yet, 2024’s events have shown that no amount of preparation can entirely eliminate risk.
Photo credit - Facebook: Rolex Sydney Hobart
Central to the debate is the autonomy of skippers to make decisions during extreme conditions. The Cruising Yacht Club of Australia (CYCA), which organises the race, defended its choice to proceed despite the forecast, citing that skippers ultimately bear responsibility for their vessels and crews.
“Each skipper must assess their boat and team’s capability,” said CYCA Commodore David Jacobs. “The race has always been about pushing limits, but within the boundaries of sound judgment.”
However, Christian Beck, skipper of LawConnect, raised concerns about the risks of heavy downwind sailing. “The safety of crew members should always be the priority. Racing in these conditions stretches the limits of both boats and people,” he said, emphasising the need for better equipment standards. An experienced skipper, with many off-shore races under his belt. he mentioned that he found the first night ‘super scary‘.
Critics argue that the CYCA’s emphasis on skipper responsibility is insufficient. Public outcry following the deaths has called for stricter measures, including race postponements during extreme
132 | ISSUE 111 | MAR 2025 | THE REPORT
forecasts. Others advocate for enhancing communication tools, such as satellite tracking and distress systems, to ensure faster responses during emergencies.
Despite these criticisms, many in the sailing community defend the race’s current framework. “Ocean racing is inherently risky,” said veteran sailor Peter Kingston. “No amount of regulation can make it completely safe, and it’s up to participants to accept that reality.”
The Sydney to Hobart Yacht Race epitomises the allure of pushing human and technological boundaries. However, as this year’s tragedy shows, the line between daring and, what some people would consider to be recklessness, can be perilously thin. Striking a balance between preserving the race’s adventurous spirit and ensuring participant safety is a challenge that organisers, skippers, and crews must navigate together.
The deaths of Nick Smith and Roy Quaden are a heartbreaking reminder of the risks sailors face in pursuit of their passion. While the 2024 Sydney to Hobart has reopened old wounds and sparked fresh controversy, it also presents an opportunity to reflect, adapt, and improve.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148
