search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
To conclude, the reason for producing this Open Letter to industry is that we are keen to advise our surveyor members, insurers, owners and operators of the correct rules, as well as highlighting some of confusion and conflicting regulations that currently exist.


We also recognised a need to advise our members and other interested parties of a correct Code of Practice to apply in an attempt to level the playing field and ultimately to keep surveyors safe from litigation.


The readings should be presented on a separate UTS form (see example below) stating the parameters used for assessment. As you can see the diminution measurements have been listed as a percentage of material lost and can be colour-coded and easily referenced, so highlighting when a repair is imminent or required.


In truth, there may be no simple answer to all of this. I personally find some of it confusing. I hope that this article has helped to shine a light on the complexities and to enable a more informed judgment to be made when undertaking and assessing these types of surveys.


And finally. Another question recently posed by a member was to do with the installation of lithium-ion batteries in Inland Waterways vessels and for that matter, in all vessels. This remains a hot topic currently.


The requirements are covered in MGN 550 and the Workboat 3 Code of Practice below:


Repair recommendations


In response to the question regarding ‘Over-plating’ or ‘Doubling’, I personally recall in the 1980s the Ministry of Defence requiring all welders on hull structure (me included), to be code B qualified to a hull insert inclined overhead procedure. Doubling plates were to be considered an emergency repair process only. In the 1990s as a Ship Repair Manager the attending Lloyd’s surveyors would only allow doublers as temporary repairs, which were required to be replaced with inserts at the next scheduled docking. However, this was in relation to sea going craft.


In Inland Waterways vessels the over-plating/doubling of the wind and waterline appears to be quite common and if completed properly with window welding to ensure


attachment to the underlying structure, should be considered a suitable repair. However future surveys should take into consideration that no one ever knows what is going on under the over-plating.


Another exception would be floating house boats (definition: a boat which is or can be moored for use as a dwelling or a non-navigable vessel used for accommodation), often kept on non-tidal waters or drying berths. With these vessels the principal concern is keeping water out and staying afloat rather than structural strength. But again, this must be made perfectly clear in the report, because the danger is that the vessel could be sold to someone who intends to re- engine the craft and turn it back into a navigable vessel. It is not unknown for owners to take their vessels across the English channel to cruise the continental waterways!


8.3.3


- A fuel tank and lithium-ion batteries


used as a source of power for propulsion shall be located in separate spaces which do not share a boundary with any accommodation space or each other.


The misleading wording is “batteries used as a source of power for propulsion” which implies that batteries installed for other uses such as engine starting and domestic power are not subject to the same guidelines.


This has resulted in surveyors, (me included) in making judgements and interpretations which were not to the vessel owner/operator’s liking. Unless more specific advice is forthcoming, the decision on the suitability of a particular installation will often fall to the surveyor concerned depending on the individual circumstances. Once again it is left to the surveyor to interpret the rules and guidance to the best of his/her ability and ultimately at their own conscience.


112 | ISSUE 111 | MAR 2025 | THE REPORT


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148