runaway caused by this vicious cycle will lead to a rapid self-heating fire that can cause an explosion and produce toxic gases in car decks. To this day, there is no medium to stop the process.
This sequence of events could, for example, occur on a ferry carrying thousands of people and hundreds of electric vehicles. The outcome is not difficult to imagine.
Furthermore, new electric vehicles are frequently placed in car carriers with bumper-to-bumper spacing of 30 centimetres and mirror-to-mirror spacing of only 10 centimetres. As a result, in a carrier with thousands of vehicles, accessing the car with thermal runaway would be very difficult if not impossible, particularly if it is located in the middle of a stow.
Similarly dangerous situations can arise when cars are transported as regular cargo in containers. For instance, a container with an EV could be placed next to a container with IMDG Code (International Maritime Dangerous Goods) cargo such as flammable gases or liquids.
Current regulations in terms of ship design and safety equipment
The current regulation does not specify any additional equipment or specific vessel requirements for shipping EVs. SOLAS Ch. II-2 Reg. 1, 2, and 3 contain all relevant regulations. The International Maritime Organization (IMO) is working to create a better regulatory environment, but this will most likely take several years. Even if the IMO agrees on new regulations, they may only apply to newbuilds and not to existing ships.
As a result, shipowners are strongly advised to assess their procedures
and implement proactive measures to improve their own safety.
Crew training
Another issue is the lack of proper crew training. The requirements as per STCW (Standards of Training, Certification, and Watchkeeping) are minimum. It only deals with general emergency, fire emergency and some special cargoes like gas.
Thermal runaway is considered as being just a normal fire. STCW needs to update crew training so seafarers can understand these batteries, thermal runaway, and its consequences.
Furthermore, a detailed risk assessment by experts could help establish onboard equipment requirements additional to statutory equipment, as some statutory equipment is not suitable or appropriate.
Additionally, shipowners frequently bring up the subject of manning levels, another area that requires investigation.
Commercial pressure and impact
Ferries
According to my anecdotal research on ferry companies’ websites, when you book a ferry, the company does not inquire whether the vehicle transported is electric or not. Passengers also reported that they were not asked about the state of their EV batteries or informed whether they could charge them onboard prior to boarding.
The option of charging could be a good selling point for some businesses to invest in. However, it appears that there is currently no marine type of equipment, either
by class or flag. As a result, before investing, shipowners should ensure that the equipment is compatible with their vessels and the vehicles being carried. In addition, the CII (Carbon Intensity Indicator) regulation should be considered before making any moves as onboard charging capability could impact the CII rating.
Car carriers
Shipping companies transport major brand orders on their large PCTC carriers. EVs are typically charged between 30% and 50%. However, a few OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers) require that their electric vehicles be fully charged due to a fear of the battery draining on passage with resulting damage to their EVs. This puts a lot of pressure on the shipowners, but shipowners must communicate their concerns in order to establish mutually agreed safety regulations and protocols to minimise risks.
Container ships
As previously mentioned, EVs are loaded as general cargo which proposes serious threats if they are placed next to IMDG cargo. Shippers and shipowners need to communicate with each other in order to avoid this phenomenon.
Additional measures to be considered
The boards below present additional measures in accordance with each vessel type. The x demonstrates whether said measure should apply to said vessel.
This article, which first appeared on the SAFETY4SEAS website, has been edited from Mr. Taslim Imad’s presentation during the 2023 SAFETY4SEA Limassol Forum.
You can watch Taslim’s presentation at
https://youtu.be/vkUl61NQjZw.
The Report • June 2023 • Issue 104 | 115
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144
