search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FACILITY UPGRADES


Table 1. Remodelling of hospital facilities and outcomes. Strategy


1 Architectural, engineering, and construction changes l Conversion of general wards to isolation wards


Outcome l Expansion of bed capacity


l Installation of simple negative-pressure units equipped with HEPA filter l Improvement of relative workforce efficiency l Construction of corridor doors l Introduction of camera monitors l Carbon dioxide detectors


2 Staff and patient management l Reassignment of personnel


l Separating contagious patient traffics l Screening patients before entering wards


hospitals than in non-remodeled hospitals in the late phase of the surge (1.69 vs. 0.38, p<0.05). However, in the subgroup analysis stratified by patients’ status, i.e., those on ventilators and on ECMO, the difference between remodelled and nonremodelled hospitals did not reach statistical significance (0.014 vs. 0.007 on ventilators, p=0.12; 0.002 vs. 0.001 on ECMO, p=0.23). In the non-remodeled hospitals, the


COVID-19 patient: nurse ratio was significantly higher in hospitals where the staff experienced difficulties than in those where the staff did not experience any difficulties (p<0.05). This also appeared to be the case regardless of patients’ status in the non-remodeled hospitals (0.014 vs. 0.004 on ventilators, p<0.05; 0 vs. 0.001 on ECMO, p<0.05). In contrast, in the remodelled hospitals, there were no significant differences in these ratios between hospitals with and without difficulties (Fig 3).


6) Incidence of clusters In the remodelled hospitals, the annual incidence of clusters in the late phase of the surge was significantly higher in hospitals with difficulties than in those without difficulties in provision of medical services (0.37 vs. 0, p<0.01) (Fig 4).


Discussion


Our data demonstrated that the remodelling of hospital facilities was associated with expansion of bed capacity for COVID-19 patients without a significant increase in infection clusters. It was also demonstrated that a large number of the admitted COVID-19 patients were on ventilators; nevertheless, this proportion was kept low in comparison with that in non-remodeled hospitals. This indicates that remodelling enabled hospitals to accommodate more COVID-19 patients


2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.66 0.50 0.26 0 Remodelled Figure 3. Staff strain and COVID-19 hospitalisations.


without ventilators or ECMO. Our study also revealed that the COVID-19 patients: nurse ratio was significantly higher in remodelled hospitals than in those without remodelling. Remodelling appeared to improve the efficiency of nursing practice for COVID-19. These changes did not depend on the patients’ status because there were no significant differences in the patients: nurse ratio, regardless of the medical equipment COVID-19 patients were on. Because of the quality of the HVAC systems of many converted wards, the makeshift hospital wards are possibly more useful for providing medical care for patients with mild to moderate symptoms. Some previous reports have pointed out the importance of architectural and engineering modifications other than management of staff and patients.4 However, the concept of remodelling is different from simple modification of the hospital infrastructure, such as repurposing other non-ICU beds to ICU beds and setting up de novo ICUs or field hospitals. Remodelling is even different from long- term architectural and engineering strategies such as construction of hospital buildings with flexible bed capacity for


The COVID-19 patients: nurse ratio was significantly higher in remodelled hospitals than in those without remodelling


IFHE DIGEST 2024


medical space. We attempted to increase bed capacity by running existing beds more efficiently by infrastructure adaptation together with management of human resources. This paper presents the outcomes of this strategy. In the present study, we examined the


subjective views of healthcare staff. In the remodelled hospitals, neither the increased patients: nurse ratios nor COVID-19 hospitalisations was associated with experiencing difficulties. It is suggested that workload may be reduced not only by physically increased bed capacity or improved efficiency of medical practices. The responses to the descriptive questionnaire revealed that there were three main reasons for difficulties with COVID-19 hospitalization; i.e., infection control, bed shortage and staff shortage. Our results also suggested that the hospital facilities could solve staff and bed shortages, but remodelling could not necessarily solve the staff’s strain or workload caused by infection clusters. In remodelled hospitals, the incidence of clusters was associated with the staff’s experience of difficulties despite that the frequency of clusters was not associated with increased COVID-19 hospitalisations. The strategies for remodelling mainly deal with hospital infrastructure; nevertheless, other concurrent and complementary activities were also required in the COVID-19 crisis management response such as


35 Non-remodelled 1.98 1.49 p<0.05 NS


l Recruitment of staff, but no relief of stress related to infection


n Difficulties (–) n Difficulties (+)


COVID patient : nurse ratio


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98