search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
SUSTAINABILITY


therefore the energy needs of its buildings: a fully decarbonised kWh is a kWh that is not used. The recent steep rise in energy prices and their current volatility reinforces this reduction and control approach. This approach was also supported in France by the deployment of the RT 2005 and then RT 2012 regulations.


l Next, controlling the energy source to meet its needs: depending on the region’s offer, the choice shifts to energies that meet needs (e.g. a distribution temperature regime) and carbon neutral targets. The arrival of RE 2020 tends to favour the emergence of zero-carbon sources of energy production.


l This ultimately results in the selection of energy production architecture (biomass boiler, solar panels, etc.) that meets needs while also offering a zero-carbon source of energy.


Final energy consumption profiles Needs Reducing the carbon footprint of a healthcare facility in terms of needs is tackled on two sides: l The static part, the envelope’s performance, which includes losses through walls, ingress, or solar gains.


l The dynamic part, usage, i.e. consumption linked to fresh air and air quality, domestic hot water and processes.


Regarding static needs, over the last twenty years, we can see that successive thermal regulations have led to a stark improvement in building envelope performance, in terms of insulation, joinery, thermal bridges, and airtightness. This technical approach, combined with a bioclimatic approach, helps manage the building’s envelope (Fig 2).


70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0


RT 2005 RT 2012 RE 2020 Regulations


Figure 2. Envelope performance: static heating needs per m2 for a tertiary building.


18 n Inpatient wards n Surgical department Figure 3. Energy consumption profiles – feedback from delivered project. IFHE DIGEST 2024


50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0


3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0


Heating consumption 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0


n Inpatient wards n Surgical department


Domestic hot water consumption


n Inpatient wards n Surgical department Cooling consumption


W/m2


Source: AIA Life Designers projects kWh/m2 kWh/m2 kWh/m2


January February March April May June January July February August March September April October May November January February March April May June July August September October November December June December July August September October November December


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98