Extinction 585 nm
1-0.5h 1-1.0h 1-1.5h 1-2.0h 1-2.5h 1-3.0h 2-0.5h 2-1.0h 2-1.5h 2-2.0h 2-2.5h 2-3.0h 3-0.5h 3-1.0h 3-1.5h 3-2.0h 3-2.5h 3-3.0h 4-0.5h 4-1.0h 4-1.5h 4-2.0h 4-2.5h 4-3.0h 5-0.5h 5-1.0h 5-1.5h 5-2.0h 5-2.5h 5-3.0h
t
DECONTAMINATION
For the temperature we tested 45˚C, 55˚C and 60°C. Concentration of cleaner was 0.2%, 0.5% and 1%. We did a visual inspection after one, six, 24 and 96 hours. The sample preparation and test procedure were as follows:
Each individual material was placed in a glass beaker of appropriate size with lid. A solution of the detergent in the specified concentration was prepared with DI water and filled into the beaker. When possible, materials were only immersed approximately 2/3 of their full size to have “treated” and “untreated” areas on the same piece. The beakers were placed in a heated water bath at the chosen temperature. A temperature logger (Ebro) was added to monitor the water temperature in the bath. For easier analysis and comparison, one piece of each material was used for each time interval. After the duration of the test, all samples were rinsed with DI water and photographed for documentation. For the second test, we wanted to have not only a visual inspection as a result, but also a measurable method. It was therefore decided to execute additional tests with blue anodised aluminium.
Discolouration kinetics with blue anodised aluminium
As an addition to the immersion test with visual inspection (part A) individual tests were conducted with blue aluminium. Coloured aluminium is not expected to be affected by corrosion; however, the colour often slowly fades due to chemical exposure
0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0
Soaked in solution Material compatibility test for colour anodised aluminium-blue/softened water-5ml/l-60˚C
Graph 1. The results for the newly developed discolouration kinetics test. The colour loss curve of blue aluminum in 0.5% solution shows the different extinction with reference to amount of colour, which every cleaning chemical was able to dissolve from the test body
NOVEMBER 2019
WWW.CLINICALSERVICESJOURNAL.COM I 79 Belimed Protect Mild Alkaline Enzyme Cleaner
Detergent A (mild alkaline enzymatic detergent)
Figure 2. Results of immersion test with visual inspection for aluminium silver with 0.5% and 55 ˚C measured after 0, 1, 6, 24 and 96 hours of exposure
and therefore creates a negative aesthetic effect. This effect varies depending on the detergent / concentration / temperature combinations. The immersion test was conducted as described previously (see part A), with the exception that the evaluation
Belimed Protect Mild Alkaline Enzyme Cleaner
was performed by measuring the absorption of colour in the solution the plates were immersed into. A photometer was used to analyse the samples. A value for “how much colour” is lost from the aluminum plates is calculated and each analysis gives a new
Belimed Protect Neutral Enzyme Cleaner Detergent A
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104