search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
PATIENT SAFETY


devices, such as pre-filled safety syringes for subcutaneous delivery, are becoming a key tool. A variety of issues are likely to continue to further drive up this shift to home and self-care – increasing the need for adequate measures and devices. For instance, populations in the Western world are ageing as a consequence of higher life expectancy. As a result, populations are presenting a higher number of people suffering from morbidities8


such as diabetes


or rheumatoid arthritis, heart disease, Chrohn’s disease, cancer and many others. With an increasing number of older people to treat, national healthcare systems are finding that their already stretched staff numbers need to be supported by encouraging self- administration of therapies wherever patients are able to carry them out. It is simply not cost effective to treat this growing number of patients within a clinical setting.


Biological drug therapies


Another interesting driver for self- administration via prefilled syringes is the new wave of biological drug therapies entering the market. These therapies are often those that provide best outcomes for patients suffering from chronic conditions, such as neurological, cardio-vascular and auto-immune diseases. Typically, biologics and biosimilars are administered via subcutaneous injection – due to their larger molecular size – and require regular dosage, making it impractical to continue visiting a clinic – or indeed to call out a nurse for each injection. Self-administration not only empowers the patient and encourages them to be more compliant with their medication regime, but significantly reduces the burden on the healthcare system.


As a number of original biologics come out of patent protection, a host of new drugs are entering a newly competitive market reducing cost to patients and encouraging self-administration. Specifically, between


2018 and 2020 a significant number of original biologics are coming off patent protection, opening up the market to biosimilar competitors.9


Biological drugs can


carry very specific requirements on accuracy of dosage which explains the popularity of pre-filled syringes as delivery devices for these types of drugs, especially in a home care or self-administration setting where there is no professional presiding. Older patients and the very infirm will also tend to be less dexterous and could struggle with accurate dosage, making pre- filled devices all the more appealing when encouraging this demographic to self- administer. Similarly, low dexterity also dictates that devices for self-administration should be easy to use, requiring minimal force to activate and passive safety mechanisms to reduce additional activation steps; patients with severe rheumatoid


arthritis could experience crippling pain in trying to activate more complex mechanisms for example. As a result, the global demand for self-administration pre-fills is also leaning significantly towards devices that are easy to hold and operate such as auto-injectors.


Pre-filled devices


Finally, another additional factor driving the increase in pre-filled devices in the US and Europe is an increase in pressure from health authorities carrying out closer scrutiny on medication administration further to medication error scandals10


reported in the


national press. Pre-filled syringes could help ensure that the correct drug is delivered, accurately and in the appropriate dose significantly reducing the risk of medical errors. Another factor relates to time-saving potential: prefilled devices and syringes can help overburdened healthcare staff deliver


72 I WWW.CLINICALSERVICESJOURNAL.COM


NOVEMBER 2019


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104