search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
MEDICAL DEVICE REGULATION


90% of flash burns started because of smoking’. The Administration points to estimates on the proportion of patients who continue to smoke while using home oxygen, despite being warned of the inherent dangers, which range from 10% to 50%. Numerous other studies firmly establish the link between patients smoking and home oxygen fires. In 2019 for example, the US National Fire Prevention Association (NFPA) reported that ‘medicinal oxygen was involved in 13% of the home smoking material fire deaths’.4


It has previously reported a likely annual death rate from home fires involving oxygen administration equipment of around


70. That’s in addition to over 1200 injuries, figures it admits are ‘likely underestimates’. The ISO standard that covers oxygen concentrator equipment (ISO 80601-2- 69:2014) is also conclusive. Under the subclause covering ‘Additional requirements for fire prevention’ it states that: “It is reasonably foreseeable that patients who are on supplemental oxygen will continue to smoke.” In the face of this evidence, it is hard to argue that home oxygen fires are not entirely foreseeable, and that risk control measures, such as oxygen firebreaks, which now constitute the ‘state of the art’, should be installed.


The MDR and new reporting requirements


So, if home oxygen fires are foreseeable, measures are available to prevent or mitigate their impact, and the standard requires them, the question arises: ‘should home oxygen fires be considered reportable incidents?’. The MDR may simplify this question. For the first time, the regulations make it clear that Distributors need to provide Manufacturers with more data on incidents (home oxygen installers are defined as ‘Distributors’ under the MDR).* It will require them to maintain a register of complaints and to forward ‘suspected incidents’ immediately to the Manufacturer, importer, or authorised representative. Distributors will no longer be in a position under the new regulations to make a judgement on whether the incident is reportable or not; responsibility for processing the data lies solely with the Manufacturer. In that case, who should the home


In its guidance on usability and risk assessment, the MDR makes it clear that any misuse of a device that can be reasonably anticipated needs to be addressed during the risk management process.


44 I WWW.CLINICALSERVICESJOURNAL.COM


oxygen service provider (Distributor) report home oxygen fire incidents to? Is it the nasal cannula supplier, the firebreak manufacturer, or the oxygen delivery device (oxygen concentrator, cylinder, or liquid oxygen device) manufacturer? Without doubt the delivery device manufacturer should be informed, and if the MDR requires at least one report to be filed, I would argue that – as a precaution – it would be as well to inform all the others.


Judgement rests with the Manufacturer not the Distributor


Once it receives the incident data, the Manufacturer is responsible for investigating and considering whether the complaint meets the criteria for reporting. It has to decide whether:


NOVEMBER 2019


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104