search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
WATER SYSTEM HYGIENE & SAFETY


Above: The Markwik 21+ Panel-Mounted Thermostatic Basin Mixer.


Left: An en-suite shower room featuring Armitage Shanks’ Contour 21+ and Markwik 21+ products.


and healthcare staff at the earliest stage. It also requires challenging some of the old guidance, which has now been superseded by newer research. Considering the breadth and complexity of these projects, this example is just one of a vast number of decisions that must be carefully examined from the perspective of water safety. Communicating with and educating stakeholders on this scale, and at the level of detail necessary, was another challenge that emerged during the Water Safety Forum – examples of tasks such as assembling pipework, the positioning of elbow-operated tap levers, and application of sealant to basins, all have serious implications for water safety risk.


It is not possible to have clinical staff


or Water Safety Groups looking over the shoulder of every contractor at all times, and it’s here that targeted education and training can assist contractors in understanding how important their role is, and building the competence needed to identify and mitigate risks. There needs to be a ‘no job too small’ approach to every task, and some basic questions that everyone working on a project should be able to answer, e.g. n Can this task be performed incorrectly? n What are the consequences for patients?


The multidisciplinary approach should extend to manufacturers, who need to proactively add their expertise to help answer these questions. Installation instructions for relevant products must be created from a patient care perspective, according to both where and how they will be used. Again, there is an argument for introducing WSGs at an even earlier stage, ideally before a healthcare- focused product design is signed off for manufacture. If performed correctly, this is


54 Health Estate Journal September 2024


an opportunity for collaboration between manufacturers and WSGs, and allows both to add to their expertise, and ultimately their competence.


A work in progress The vast majority of existing NHS assets aren’t brand new, and patient safety depends on their safe maintenance and operation, as well as engineering best practice being implemented and checked. Establishing competence in a working healthcare environment, rather than building on a static design, is an entirely different proposition, and there are opportunities as well as challenges. Achieving a consistent level of


competence across all the staff working in these facilities has become all the more difficult with job vacancies at record levels, and almost a third of staff coming from service delivery partners. There are anecdotal reports of hospital staff having to give contractors off-the-cuff lessons on best practice when their training hasn’t been adequate. Here, again, the value of the multidisciplinary approach is clear, but so is the difficulty of establishing the same level of competence and urgency across disciplines – what might be second nature to one job role will be challenging and new for another, so feedback has to flow in both directions.


Free on-site training offered The Water Safety Forum was advised that to help combat these potential issues, and develop competencies, Armitage Shanks offers free on-site training to NHS Trusts, highlighting key information and best practice guidance for its Markwik range of thermostatic taps. An advantage of working closely with employees is that it’s possible to hear and respond to their feedback. Existing ways of working can be reviewed and improved faster, and


new solutions tested and implemented, rather than having to wait for long periods before seeing the benefits of new approaches. For example, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust has implemented a Water Action Group (WAG) (that reports to its WSG) to examine water sampling results and current hygiene procedures as they happen, and quickly trial and implement improvements. The WAG’s latest focus has been


the ‘one basin, two cloths’ protocol for cleaning basins in the hospital, with one cloth for the basin and another for the taps and drain; cleaning progresses from cleaner areas such as taps to dirtier ones, and finally the water outlet to the drain. The WAG is testing a ‘tweaked’ protocol in which every basin is cleaned with a dry cloth prior to wet cleaning to remove any water residues that dilute the chlorine solution used in the cleaning process. Staff are also being taught how to clean and manage point-of-use filters. Testing the new method on one ward


since January 2023 saw a 53% reduction in positive Pseudomonas aeruginosa samples over a two-week period. This process of trialling and improvement should be a constant in all healthcare settings, and demonstrates the value of a WAG that has the power to change things quickly based on consistent monitoring. One of the key ‘take-aways’ from the Water Safety Forum is that we are all still learning, and we shouldn’t be afraid to share knowledge.


Finding the right people Water Safety Plans should require that potential contractors provide comprehensive evidence of training and competency, and this includes those involved in the commissioning process for new or refurbished facilities. This


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120