search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
WHY ACCURATE DISSOLVED ORGANICS MEASUREMENT MATTERS FOR OPTIMUM DRINKING WATER QUALITY


Natural Organic Matter (NOM) exists in all sources of fresh water and, if not properly removed, can affect the effi ciency of potable water treatment and the quality of the treated water. In this article, Julian Edwards, Product Manager for Continuous Water Analysers for ABB Measurement & Analytics in the UK, explains why the removal of NOM is crucial for optimizing process effi ciency and personal safety. He also looks at for the best ways to accurately measure NOM levels throughout the potable water treatment cycle.


What is NOM and why is it a problem?


NOM is caused when decayed vegetation mixes with water. It’s a problem that must be closely monitored and controlled throughout potable water treatment processes to ensure the end result meets the highest levels of quality and safety for human use and/or consumption.


Most NOM is comprised of humic and fulvic substances that in most cases not in involving industrial pollution originates from soil coupled with decomposing plants and animals that enter streams, rivers, and lakes as well as aquifers. These substances are responsible for turning water from yellow to brown. They also provide an environment for bacteria and fungi to thrive in a way that can add to microbial growth in a water distribution system. Failure to adequately remove these NOM can increase the risk of pathogen-induced diseases, unpalatable taste and oppressive odor.


The importance of effective treatment


The central challenge for water utilities is their ability to accurately detect the wide variations of potential issues in the vast quantities of water passing through their plants to enable effective treatment. To protect people from the harmful effects of trihalomethanes (THMs), there must be highly accurate detection methods in place. Previously, to detect THMs required costly and time -consuming laboratory tests.


Various NOM elements are usually removed during the coagulation, fl occulation, and fi ltration stages of the water treatment process prior to the fi nal chlorination treatment. It is particularly important to remove humic substances in particular prior to chlorination because any remaining NOM can chemically react with the added chlorine to create undesirable disinfection by-products (DBPs) such as. THMs are known as possibly carcinogenic by-products that can be formed when organic material in water reacts with chloramines. Therefore, if pH and temperature conditions combine in the right recipe, a reaction


with the disinfectant used to make the water safer can potentially have the opposite effect of making it more detrimental to health.


For example, the presence of THMs in drinking water has been linked to heart, lung, kidney, liver, central nervous system damage and bladder or colorectal cancer. Several studies have also associated high levels of THMs in drinking water with an above average risk of miscarriages. Because of this, THM levels in public water supplies are strictly controlled and the controls are getting even tighter to ensure that THM levels in public water supplies remain within demonstrably safe limits.


To achieve that, water treatment processes must be able to maximize the removal of NOM safely, effi ciently, and consistently from water sources. To minimize the risk of DBP formation, utilities use modifi ed conventional processes such as enhanced coagulation and softening to ensure that organic materials are dissolved and reduced to levels that fall within indisputably safe limits. Many processes also use an activated carbon stage as an additional means capturing any dissolved organic matter that may escape processing during the coagulation stage.


The benefi ts of continuous online monitoring


Any issues with water treatment must be caught and resolved early to ensure public safety and health. Continuous on-line monitoring is essential to provide early warnings of any changes


AV400


to the treatment process, enabling timely and well-informed decision-making. Until recent years this testing was done using manual means, either in the fi eld or at processing facility. Quality control was broadly maintained, but any issues were slow to materialize until a potential hazard had been identifi ed through visual inspection or an incidence of ill health. This level of manual process control is not sustainable given today’s demands Potentially important events that must be identifi ed and rectifi ed immediately to preserve safety can be missed, and any manual test results will only be indicative of a particular moment in time rather than the present circumstances.


Tests done in the present must offer immediate and accurate results. And when it comes to detecting the presence of dissolved organics in raw water throughout the range of potable water treatment processes, there are two methods that can be used, specifi cally colour and UV detection.


Colour monitoring


Colorimetric measurement is, as the word suggests, the observation of colour as a measurement of a chemical in a solution. Colour determines the levels of either the absorption or concentration of a certain chemical based on the degree of colour depth and change and the ability of light to pass through it. With the exception of organics monitoring, many of the substances that need to be measured are colourless because


12TH & 13TH OCTOBER | TELFORD, UK


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92