Environmental Laboratory 7


Nanomaterials classification in the environment


Manufactured or engineered nanomaterials are used in a wide range of consumer products, manufacturing processes and medical applications. Products include cosmetics, sunscreens, paints, bandages and clothing. Examples of manufactured nanomaterials include silver (Ag), titania (TiO2), ceria (CeO2), fullerenes and carbon nanotubes.


Incidental nanomaterials arise because of human activity. e.g. diesel exhaust particulates, tyre wear debris and mineral extraction wastes.


Natural nanoscale objects, including minerals and organic nanoparticles, occur in the environment. e.g. ash clouds and natural decomposition products in water.


Following a brief introduction from Simon Neal, Executive Editor of the journal, Prof Peter Vikesland from Virginia Tech, USA who is also Editor -in-Chief of Environmental Science:Nano opened the scientific presentations.


The application of nanotechnology to better understand the chemistry of confined spaces


Prof Vikesland specialises in the use of nanotechnology for the detection and remediation of environmental contaminants and carries out ongoing studies to examine the potentially damaging impacts of nanotechnology on environmental systems. His research includes the development of nano-enabled sensors for the tracking of pathogens and their DNA; determining the environmental impacts of nanoparticles as contaminants; determining the triggers and kinetics of disinfection by-product formation; and characterising the chemical properties of aerosols. His presentation focussed on understanding the chemistry of confined spaces and specifically the application of Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) for the measurement of the pH of suspended aqueous droplets and aerosols such as smog, clouds, salt spray and exhaled breath. Aerosols play a major role in many environmental processes, as does pH, and therefore understanding the pH profiles of individual aerosol droplets is very important for a wide range of environmental issues. Conventional techniques collect and bulk the droplets prior to pH measurement, but this only provides an average value for all collected droplets and assumes all droplets are the same. 4-Mercaptobenzoic acid (4MBA) in conjunction with gold nano particles is well known as a model analyte for SERS study but 4MBA deprotonates at high pH (showing bands for COOH at 1710cm-1, and COO- at 1410cm-1) and this can be used to measure pH in the range 5-11 using SERS.


Aerosols are created containing the components of interest, 4MBA and gold nanoparticles. The resulting individual droplets are collected on hydrophobic filters which can then be analysed using SERS. Using this approach, the pH in the centre of droplets was determined to be between 8 and 13 which differs from the bulk solution measured pH of 7.4. Further analysis using confocal imaging shows a pH gradient between the droplet edge and the core and that the droplet air water interface is acidic with a highly basic core and this knowledge will be key in future aerosol studies in environmental systems. Prof Vikesland then briefly described how this work was now being extended, including the use of other complexing reagents with nanoparticles, to study the chemistry of other ‘confined space’ systems such as biofilms, plants, cancer cells and other environmentally relevant materials.


Multifunctional nanoscale material platforms for advanced environmental applications


This topic was presented by Prof John Fortner from Washington University in St Louis, USA, who is an Associate Editor of Environmental Science:Nano. He began by discussing graphene and how it can be easily derivatised with oxygen to form graphene oxides which have been employed in composite membranes for advanced water treatment. However, traditional membrane constructions can have tortuous flow paths and low permeability and Prof Fortner described the development of multifunctional, crumpled graphene oxide (CGO) porous nanocomposites that are assembled as advanced, reactive water treatment membranes.


Crumpled 3D graphene oxide-based materials differ from 2D flat graphene oxide analogues in that they are highly resistant to aggregation and compression which allows for the incorporation of other multifunctional particles inside the 3D composite


structure (2). He described how assemblies of nanoscale CGO with encapsulated Titanium Dioxide (TiO2), Magnetite, Silver and Gold nanoparticles not only allow high water flux via vertically tortuous nanochannels outperforming comparable commercial ultrafiltration membranes, but also demonstrate excellent separation efficiencies for model organic and biological foulants. He also discussed performance improvements obtained with CGO based nanocomposite structures in terms of a 97% reduction in fouling, improved photocatalytic degradation of impurities and superior antimicrobial properties. Turning to cleaning and reuse he presented performance data generated from 5 in-situ recycles of a CGO-TiO2-Magnetite composite membrane using back flush, magnetic particle removal and regeneration. He summarised by reinforcing the main benefits of CGO composite membranes of high permeability and multifunctionality.


What can we do when Nano meets Environmental Science?


This was the question posed by Dr Xianjin Cui, a research fellow at the University of Birmingham. He began by listing the wide range of potential application areas for engineered nanoparticles(NP) and materials before raising the question of safety and risk, which must consider not only toxicity and eco- toxicity of the nanomaterial, but also questions such as how much will be released through its life cycle, its fate after any release and how it may be converted in the release environment. He described some of the challenges in characterising nanoparticles in environmental complex media where they may be present at trace levels and may have changed shape and/or their chemical form in the sample. Sample homogeneity and issues with identifying and quantifying engineered nanoparticles in the presence of naturally occurring material were also highlighted. He then introduced the Facility for Environmental Nanoscience Analysis and Characterisation (FENAC) at Birmingham University which is funded by the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) to support environmental nanoscience and nanotoxicology research. FENAC has access to, and expertise in, a full suite of characterisation techniques and employs separation methods alongside microscopic and spectroscopic techniques for nanoparticle characterisation.


Separation methods include symmetric and asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation, split-flow thin cell fractionation, dialysis and ultrafiltration devices including cross flow ultrafiltration which are all used for size fractionation. Thermo gravimetric analysis tandem coupled with fourier transfer infra-red and mass spectrometry (TGA-FTIR-MS) for the analysis of thermal desorption and degradation products was also available. Microscopy and imaging techniques include Scanning and Transmission Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy for elemental analysis, Atomic Force Microscopy, Confocal Microscopy and Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis. Trace elemental analysis was provided by ICP-MS.


Dr Cui described how combining this wide range of separation and measurement techniques allowed them to to overcome some of the challenges of complex media, trace levels and reproducibility.


crop performance. Nanomaterials can easily be taken up by plants and their tuneable surface chemistry and inherent slow release properties can be employed to deliver targeted benefits. He described how Ceria based nanoparticles had been shown to increase photosynthesis in plants exposed to high salinity and how metal oxide nanoparticles containing copper, manganese and zinc had all reduced the presence of disease and that copper also had increased crop yield for both tomatoes and eggplants. He described his work in studying the uptake and movement of leaf sprayed nanoparticles to all parts of plants including the roots and even the surrounding soil and how they have developed nanoparticle coatings which facilitate 100% entry of the particles to the plant. Using synchrotron XRF and XANES they could study nanoparticle uptake and trace it around the plant and found size based effects in that smaller ones could migrate out to the soil whereas larger ones remained in the leaf. He also discussed how positively charged particles tended to move to the roots while negative charged ones tended to stay in the leaves. Thus, by combining coating selectivity, size and particle charge parameters, targeted delivery for greatest efficacy can be achieved.


He concluded by reinforcing that there were tremendous application opportunities for engineered nanotechnology in agriculture and especially for the efficient and targeted delivery of micronutrients and crop protection chemicals to plants quoting the nano copper hydroxide based product Kocide 2000 as a current product in the market.


Nanostructured materials for water treatment: from lab study to village trial


Professor Weiguo Song from the Chinese Academy of Sciences and an Associate Editor of Environmental Science:Nano described how improved Chinese standards for drinking water in 2012 had driven work to reduce contaminants and particularly arsenates and fluoride in many areas. He described a trial site in Inner Mongolia where arsenic levels were 220ppb, fluroride was 3.3ppm and which also had potential issues from mercury, chromium, cadmium and lead contamination. He described how the high surface area for adsorption and or reaction with nanomaterials gives high capacity and fast kinetics making them ideally suited for use in water treatment. They employed XAFS, XPS and XANES to study the interaction of nanosphere metal oxides and their application to remove impurities in drinking water. Basic aluminium carbonate nanospheres had shown high adsorption for fluorides and arsenates and they had now scaled up production of the technology to produce drinking water treatment cartridges for household use. At the trial site in Inner Mongolia these had been running for 5 years and Prof Song quoted impurity removal figures of 97.8% for Arsenic, 84.8% for Fluoride and 90.9% for TOC (humic acids)


Prof Jerome Rose introducing the SERENADE project Professor Greg Lowry introducing his presentation.


Engineering nanomaterial properties for increasing agrochemical utilisation efficiency


Professor Greg Lowry from Carnegie Mellon University, USA, is an Editorial Board Member of Environmental Science:Nano and he began by highlighting some of the challenges facing agriculture based industries while also having to meet demands for increasing yields. Agriculture requires high energy and water usage (>70% of global water withdrawal) and was responsible for >20% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Nanotechnology has an important role to play in the agriculture sector both through studying how plants work and also through improving


From risk assessment to safer by design nanomaterials: lessons learned from the French funded SERENADE project


Prof Jerome Rose is research director at the Centre Europeen de Recherche et Denseignement de Geosciences de L’Environnement (CEREGE) and also an Editorial Board Member of Environmental Science:Nano. He began by giving a brief history of the emergence of engineered nanomaterials and the subsequent raising of concerns over toxicity and eco-toxicity and how many studies were started to look at these concerns around nanoparticles themselves. These limited studies soon moved to wider approaches where the whole life-cycle of the materials were considered including the effects on the workforce, the consumer and the environment and this then moved on to a ‘safer by design’ approach as in the SERENADE project. SERENADE is a French project which aims to develop and apply the ‘safer by


www.envirotech-online.com IET November / December 2018


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108