search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Annual Guide 2019 I SOURCE TESTING ASSOCIATION


ISO standards are accepted on a case by case principle; it is not mandatory for a member country in the European Union (EU) to adopt a standard.


CEN standards must be implemented by member states of the EU. If a confl icting standard is in existence, then this must be withdrawn.


Understanding how


standards numbers work Figure 1 shows how standards are adopted in the UK and published by British Standards Institute (BSI).


1. Should a standard be developed for example in the UK by BSI it will be prefi xed by BS e.g. BS 3841-1:1994 Determination of smoke emission from manufactured solid fuels for domestic use.


2. When a standard is developed and published by CEN it is prefi xed with EN and when introduced in the UK it will become a BS EN document e.g. BS EN 1911:2010 Stationary source emissions – Determination of mass concentration of gaseous chlorides expressed as HCl and as stated above any confl icting standard must be removed. A standard can be developed by CEN or ISO under a joint agreement and then it is published by CEN and ISO with a prefi x EN ISO and in the UK it then becomes an BS EN ISO prefi x e.g. BS EN ISO 23210:2009 Stationary source emissions – Determination of PM10/PM2.5 mass concentration in fl ue gas. A national foreword is added to the standard to indicate its scope of applicability and to highlight any UK specifi c concerns.


samplers and sample dilution. /PM2.5


3. When a standard is developed by ISO it is prefi xed ISO and should this be adopted in the UK it becomes BS ISO e.g. BS ISO 25597:2015 Stationary source emissions – Test method for determining PM10


mass in stack gases using cyclone Figure 1 Diagram of the world family of standards


Standards developed and published by CEN are generally accepted as being the most robust. However, other standards are still important, as there are substances that are not, as yet, covered by CEN Standards. The choice of the method is often dictated by the requirements of EU Directives, i.e. Industrial Emission Directive (IED), where, for example, the use of CEN standards is mandatory. If the standard is not dictated by mandatory requirements, then monitoring standards should be used in the following order of priority as given in the European IPPC Bureau’s Reference Document (http://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa. eu/) on the General Principles of Monitoring:


1. EN standards 2. ISO standards, other international standards, national standards 3. Validated laboratory-developed and non-standard methods


The intended application of the standard method must always be taken into account; for example, a CEN method may be less suitable than another less-rigorously validated standard method if the application is not one for which the CEN method was developed.


WHY NOT JOIN THE SOURCE TESTING ASSOCIATION The Association offers a Package of benefi ts to its Members which include:


TRAINING ON EMISSION MONITORING AND MCERTS TECHNICAL ADVICE RELATING TO EMISSION MONITORING CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION OPPORTUNITIES SEMINARS AND TRAINING ON A VARIETY OF RELATED ACTIVITIES


REPRESENTATION ON NATIONAL, EUROPEAN AND INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ORGANISATIONS


THE OPPORTUNITY TO DIRECTLY INTERACT WITH THE ORGANISATIONS AND INDIVIDUALS RESPONSIBLE FOR FRAMING FUTURE REGULATORY STANDARDS


FOR FURTHER DETAILS CONTACT SAMANTHA HARVEY ON +44 (0) 1462 457535 ALTERNATIVELY VISIT WWW.S-T-A.ORG


29


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108