search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Bhutan takin 363


FIG. 6 Conditional inference tree displaying significant explanatory variables for the question ‘What determines preference that the takin should be protected?’ 163 of 169 possible respondents answered. Respondent’s fondness for the takin was the only significant predictor.


of respondents addressed the question of whether the takin should be protected. This cohort comprised residents who were willing to support takin conservation by protecting takin and its habitat (16%; n = 27); being an informant on illegal activities (14%; n = 24); not harming and disturbing the takin (14%; n = 23); providing required assistance (9%; n = 16); contributing labour for takin conservation (8%; n = 13); and spreading awareness of the takin (7%; n = 12).


Discussion


The overall positive perception of the takin by residents of Jigme Dorji National Park could be attributed to the Buddhist religious ethos of respect for life and harmonious coexistence with nature (Brooks, 2010). Similarly, Hindus in India and Nepal share similar views by practicing ahimsa, which equates to respecting all life forms (Sahni, 2008). Positive attitudes to snow leopards have been reported in other Himalayan Buddhist regions in Ladakh (Fox & Chundawat, 1988) and Spiti in Himachal Pradesh, India (Bagchi &Mishra, 2006). The Bhutan takin also has local re- ligious andmythological significance thatmay enhance posi- tive perceptions. Legend has it that the so-called Divine Madman Lam Drukpa Kuenley, a significant religious figure in Bhutan, combined the head of a goat with the body of a cow to create the takin (Downes, 2011), which led to the takin being chosen as Bhutan’snationalanimal. Awareness of the takin as the national animal was signifi-


cantly linked to knowledge of its protected status, irrespec- tive of where respondents lived. This can be attributed to conservation education awareness programmes and an


agreement with the takin’s summer habitat residents to not graze their domestic livestock 1 month prior to the arrival of migrating takin. Bhatia et al. (2017) suggested that conservation education and awareness can be best de- livered by reference to the karmic cycle in predominantly Buddhist nations, as exemplified by the annual Takin Festival in Jigme Dorji National Park, at which residents are informed of the benefits of protecting takin habitat in its summer grazing alpine meadows at Tsharijathang. This also helps to facilitate sustainable collection of the highly prized cordyceps Ophiocordyceps sinensis fungus and other non-timber forest products (Mukhai et al., 2013; Wangchuk et al., 2013; Wangchuk & Wangdi, 2015). This additional socioeconomic benefit could possibly explain the overwhelming support for takin conservation amongst park residents, in addition to the species’ national status and religious significance. Positive perception of the takin by residents in the takin’s winter range could be attributed to the fact that this species does not consume crops. The takin prefers forest for shelter (Sangay et al., 2016) and, moreover, agricultural fields are left fallow during winter. Significantly higher awareness among residents in the


takin’s summer habitat compared to residents in the winter habitat could be attributed to socioeconomic activity that increases contact with congregating takin herds in the open alpine meadows. The highly valued cordyceps in these mea- dows are collected in the summer by Laya residents,who have become affluent from the associated trade (Wangchuk et al., 2013; Shrestha et al., 2017) and are able to afford televisions and smartphones (Lhamo & Oyama, 2015;MoIC, 2016; NSB, 2016), thus increasing exposure to conservation mes- sages about the takin. Despite also having access to media, Khatey and Khamey residents are less exposed to takin in the dense broadleaved forested winter habitat, where takin herds fission into small groups that reduce chance encounters with residents collecting non-timber forest produce. Regionally, the takin is threatened by deforestation, habi-


tat fragmentation and hunting (Song et al., 2008; Dasgupta et al., 2010; Sangay et al., 2016). Despite positive perceptions towards the species, it remains Vulnerable (Song et al., 2008), facing threats from resource competition with do- mestic yaks, disturbance by free ranging dogs, habitat frag- mentation, and indirect effects from cordyceps collection through the influx of people and animals (e.g. pack horses) that impact the fragile alpine meadowecosystem and disrupt takin migration (Sangay et al., 2016). Yaks, horses and dogs further threaten the takin by potentially spreading zoonotic diseases in the summer habitat (Wangchuk et al., 2015). Protected areas in developing countries are crucial for the


provision of ecosystem services and also contribute to sus- taining rural livelihoods by allowing activities such as live- stock grazing and collection of forest products (Rajaratnam et al., 2016). The positive perception of the takin and its con- servation by residents of Jigme Dorji National Park affirms


Oryx, 2020, 54(3), 359–365 © 2019 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605318000418


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148