The market has become increasingly candidate-driven

though. With 49% of people now desiring more flexibility within their roles some organisations are feeling the pressure to compete with brands that provide this style of working, this can be particularly frustrating if it cannot be offered within certain sectors and small teams for practical reasons. Work-life balance is also a commonly discussed term

within society today. Individuals are now working to live rather than living to work. In terms of health and wellbeing, this new way of working is the way forward in order to possess a healthy, happy and therefore productive workforce. On the other hand, for those businesses that require employees to work particular shifts which are considered ‘unsociable’ across evenings and weekends, these roles may be substantially harder to fill. An additional factor causing recruitment difficulty for

There are many recruitment options, with a one-size-fits-all approach rarely the answer

also holidays and benefits, however it’s crucial to identify these influences in order to stay commercially aware and, as a result, ahead of the game. There are various routes a business can go down when

analysing the first stages of a vacancy, but the most important factor is to determine who will handle the process. The hiring manager will be the representative of the brand, therefore it is vital that they possess a certain level of experience through training in order to make hiring decisions on behalf of the organisation. In today’s changing and diverse market, businesses have

to adapt and remain innovative to secure high talent. The market is immensely candidate-driven, with experienced candidates getting snapped up within an average of ten days, highlighting the importance of actively recruiting and staying on top of the applications and communication to ensure the firm doesn’t miss out. New generations coming through to build the workforce

of the future are also reshaping recruitment as we know it. Candidates from generation Z in comparison to X and Y have expressed career progression as a key denominator when choosing a new role due to less financial burdens and the comfort of living at home for longer. This differs to previous years where a higher emphasis was placed on salary and benefits in order to make a living. Some of these changes in attitude and generational themes can cause stresses for a number of employers

hiring managers is the skill shortages visible within particular sectors such as construction and hospitality industries. It is reported that with society adopting an increased work-life balance and placing a higher emphasis on leisure time due to larger disposable income, the most hard-to-fill vacancy is currently a chef. Employers have been implementing ways to narrow this skills gap for the future by educating the youth and offering apprenticeship programmes and graduate schemes. However, with generation X approaching retirement over the next few years a noticeable experience gap may become evident with those who replace them, causing concern and recruitment panic for some organisations. With the recruitment process acting as an inconvenience

for some, it may be unsurprising that the counteroffer is larger than ever before. Businesses are now aware of the augmented career choices and the cost and time it takes to fill an empty chair. As a result of this, we are seeing an increase in firms counter offering an individual down to the last hour. For a business which has injected so much time into the process, this can be incredibly frustrating. Despite a counteroffer occasionally being a shock, if an

organisation has implemented an on boarding process and has kept in communication with a hire prior to their start date the chances of a candidate accepting a counteroffer from their current employer decreases significantly. If a business has chosen to work with an agency, this is usually carried out on the firm’s behalf, however it is still crucial to stay in touch with a new starter to make them feel welcome, enticing them to leave their comfort zone and begin a new challenge. In unfortunate cases, even when a business does what

they consider as everything, it can occasionally go wrong. The wrong hire can cost a business an average of £30K when taking all of the cost, time and loss of productivity into account. But the damage can be detrimental in many additional ways including tarnishing brand reputation, affecting team morale, adding pressure to existing employees, and the possibility of missing out on potential opportunities due to not having the capacity to manage workloads.

business network December 2019/January 2020 69

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100