search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Band VP’s Message


Quit Staring . . . at the Scoreboard


Brian Redmond WMEA Band VP


“Getting a well-rounded education and developing a love of learning that hopefully will continue to last my lifetime certainly helped prepare me to understand what’s coming at me in


this world and to adapt” - Len Elmore (Sportscaster, lawyer, former NBA player)


Let’s play a game: You are the director of one of the two following bands. Which one would you choose to be (not take over for and change, but rather who do you want to be)?


Band #1 - 20 students in 9-12 band. The students do not have a strong musical foundation but have been improving steadily during your time with the program. Grade 2 pieces are challenging for this group. The band has not received a superior rating at festival for as long as anyone can remember, and hasn’t sent anyone to All State in even longer. The students generally work hard and work well together.


Band #2 - 100 students in 9-12 band. The band has an outstanding musical foundation, typically playing pieces that are challenging and complex. Students from this band regularly attend All State, and superior ratings are expected at festivals. The students do not get along well as a whole, to the point where there have been fights between band members. The director spends as much time dealing with the SRO as with the concert band literature.


Earlier this summer, I had the opportunity to attend the


Josten’s Renaissance National Conference in Scottsdale, AZ. For five blisteringly hot days, I was able to talk philosophy with principals and educators from across the nation, sharing ideas and information. Through it all, I learned a lot - most of which can be boiled down into the following:


• Some people spend too much time looking at the scoreboard and forget there’s a game going on! - Phil Boyte (former principal and current educational consultant)


• We are what we believe” - Richard Parkhouse (author) These two quotes have the potential to shape our upcoming


school year. How much time do we, as professionals, spend looking at our own scoreboard? Do we get caught up in matters of importance (the game) or things that reflect the important stuff (the scoreboard)?


As a young educator, I spent a great deal of time pouring


over my festival results - looking for trends, areas of weakness, potential aberrations in the judges’ scores, etc. I felt that good scores meant that I was a good teacher, and if I am a good teacher, I’ll have a strong program. While my chain of events made sense, looking back, I had things in the wrong order. My festival results did not dictate my teaching ability - it was (and is) the other way around. If I am a good teacher, I can create and maintain a strong program, which will be reflected in “good scores”.


While this is not earth shattering material for (hopefully) most


of you, I’d like to point out the wide number of scoreboard things that we seem to fall into the trap of using to justify and evaluate ourselves. How often do you evaluate or spend vast amounts of time focusing on the following:


• State marching band scores • Number of kids in District Clinic/All State/All Northwest/ All National


• District festival/jazz festival scores • Number of kids enrolled in your program • Number of kids enrolled in the program “down the road” • Budget/Equipment/Facilities


These things are all important tools to help us gauge the health


and effectiveness of the work that we do. Ultimately, however, these cannot be the final indicator of the “perfect program.” If “we are what we believe,” can a II at district festival be a good score? Can a superior be a bad thing? Can Band #1 be a “good band”?


Looking at the two bands from the beginning, the “scoreboard”


is pretty clear - Band #2 should be the “better” band. Band #2 lights up the scoreboard, but is Band #2 preparing the students for success in life? Is Band #2 instilling a sense of accomplishment


18


Wyoming Windsong


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64