Despite the concession by the Chancellor that saw regulated fare rises capped at 6% rather than 8%, few passengers are aware that the inflation plus 3% formula may still apply in 2013 and 2014, say Guy Dangerfield and Anthony Smith of Passenger Focus.
S
hifting the cost of the running the railways from the taxpayer onto the
farepayer is longstanding Department for Transport policy – and it has a direct im- pact on fares.
Prices rose only by an average of 6% at the beginning of January, rather than the planned 8%, following the Chancellor’s Au- tumn Statement. The reported ‘cost’ to the Government of making the change – just under £30m in lower fares over the year – was seen as worth it, especially if fewer people were put off taking the train in the first place, and it provided a rare economic ‘good news’ headline for the Government.
When the planned 8% rise was first an- nounced in July 2011, there was “under- standable angst”, according to Guy Dan- gerfield, passenger issues manager at inde- pendent watchdog Passenger Focus.
He said: “That was partly because passen- gers cannot always see what more they are getting for their money, and partly because few people expect their salary to rise by that much this year.”
When the rise was limited to 6%, Passenger Focus chief executive Anthony Smith said: “2011 saw the industry’s inefficiencies high- lighted in a number of reports. The current policy of moving costs from the taxpayer onto the fare payer will go totally sour if the whole industry and Government does not wring better value for money out of its spending – why should passengers go on paying for a fractured inefficient industry?
“Unregulated fares have not been hit in the same way as in previous years. Whether this is because train companies felt the lim- its have finally been reached, or that pas- sengers who have a choice might baulk at paying these fares during grim economic times does not matter – let’s hope this poli- cy continues in the following months.
“Train companies also appear to have not used the flexibility to price up fares on par- ticular routes to the same extent as seen in previous years.
88 | rail technology magazine Dec/Jan 12
“Those forward looking train companies that offer direct debit schemes for season tickets are to be congratulated – spreading the cost of an annual ticket makes rail more affordable for some passengers. However, rising car park charges are also increasing the cost of using Britain’s railways.”
Importantly, the switch back to the RPI plus 1% formula seems only to apply for 2012 – will the Government push ahead with RPI plus 3% in 2013 and 2014?
Unless inflation collapses, Dangerfield said, that could mean fares are nearly 25% higher in three years’ time – and virtually nobody expects their salary to increase by that much.
“Passenger Focus will be calling for tighter limits to the amount train companies are allowed to put up particular prices by more than the regulatory cap if they reduce other fares – that is deeply unfair on those who could have a much larger fare increase.
“But there are also risks from a passenger perspective. The Government’s fare review may reopen the debate on whether certain ticket prices should be regulated at all.
“Expect the rail industry to argue that in some markets there is plenty of competi- tion from private cars, coaches and, in some cases, air, so regulation is unneces- sary. Government may not carry out anoth- er fares review for some time, so it’s crucial that this one gets to the heart of passen- gers’ concerns about the current system.”
Alvey & Towers
Visit
www.passengerfocus.org.uk Guy Dangerfield
Anthony Smith FOR MORE INFORMATION
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92